Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge saladino

In re Marti

Ruling
Confirmation of chapter 13 plan denied due to doubts that debtor could make large lump sum payment.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed his second amended chapter 13 plan and the trustee objected, stating essentially that the debtor had the financial ability to increase the monthly plan payment in order to pay a sufficient amount into the plan to pay all claims in full without the need for a lump sum payment at an indeterminate date in the future.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Marti Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 02, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-130

In re Uhrenholdt

Ruling
Taxes due on corn raised in debtor's farming operation but used as feed for later cattle feeding operation could be treated as general unsecured claim.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code and a plan was confirmed. The United States, through the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) filed a motion to compel payment of a post-petition tax.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Uhrenholdt Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 26, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-051

U.S. Bank v. Juarez (In re Juarez)

Ruling
Credit card advances incurred within 70 days of petition date were nondischargeable on grounds of fraud.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment on its claim that the debt of defendant debtor for cash advances made on his consumer credit account was nondischargeable for fraud under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A), (C).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of U.S. Bank v. Juarez (In re Juarez) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 15, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-012

Susman Entmt Inc. v. Carey (In re Carey)

Ruling
Creditor who did not object to discharge could not seek denial of discharge after discharge had been granted.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor brought an action against defendant chapter 7 debtors, a husband and wife, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2) and § 523(a)(2)(A). A motion to dismiss filed on behalf of the wife was granted, leaving the husband as the only remaining defendant.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Susman Entmt Inc. v. Carey (In re Carey) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #0209-050

In re Rickert

Ruling
Chapter 12 plan could be amended to treat postpetition capital gains taxes from prepetition sale of livestock as unsecured nonpriority claim.
Procedural posture

Chapter 12 debtors filed a motion for permanent treatment of a claim under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1222. The United States/Internal Revenue Service filed an objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rickert Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #0209-055

In re Rickert

Ruling
Postpetition taxes arising from sale of debtor's farm assets were unsecured nonpriority claims.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtors filed a motion for permanent treatment of a claim under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1222 and an amended objection by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rickert Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 29, 2008 , LexisNexis #0209-126

In re Pick

Ruling
Approval of sale of property to debtor's son denied due to insufficient recovery for creditors.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtors filed a motion to approve the sale of real and personal property, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 363(f), a creditor objected to the sale motions. A bank approved the proposed sale. The bank and the creditor both filed separate motions for relief from the stay and the debtors objected to the motions for relief from the stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pick Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 18, 2008 , LexisNexis #0209-110

LeRette v. Anderson (In re Anderson)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to inaccuracies and false statements in schedules.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed a complaint asserting that defendant debtor should be denied a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727 because of inaccuracies and/or false statement in the debtor's schedules.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of LeRette v. Anderson (In re Anderson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 06, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-125

In re Swanson

Ruling
Presumption of abuse arose once debtor's projected disposable income was revised to reflect wife's contributions.
Procedural posture

The U.S. Trustee in a chapter 7 case filed a motion to dismiss the case for abuse pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 707(b)(2) and 707(b)(3). A creditor filed a joinder, and the debtor filed a resistance.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Swanson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 07, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-019

In re West

Ruling
Default judgment did not provide basis for finding of nondischargeability based on fraud.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff judgment creditor filed this adversary proceeding to except its judgment debt from discharge on the basis of 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A), alleging that defendants, debtor husband and his construction company, obtained money from it by false pretenses, false representations, or actual fraud. The creditor moved for summary judgment, asserting that the evidence and the state court judgment established that debtor acted fraudulently.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re West Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 22, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-014