Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

northern district of mississippi

N. Miss Med. Ctr. v. Eaton (In re Eaton)

May
02
2006
Ruling
Creditor was denied summary judgment regarding dischargeability issue since genuine issue of material fact existed as to intent to cause willful or malicious injury.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an action to collect insurance payments made to defendant debtors based on the debtors'assignment of those payments to the creditor. The creditor asserted that the debts were nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) and that it was entitled to summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of N. Miss Med. Ctr. v. Eaton (In re Eaton) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 02, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-131
LexisNexis Article
Learn More

Rain Bird Corp. v. Milton (In re Milton)

Apr
03
2006
Ruling
Debts were deemed nondischargeable due to willful and malicious injury of creditor in misappropriating trade secrets and due to fiduciary defalcation.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtor, seeking a determination that a state-court judgment against the debtor for tortious interference with contract and business relations, misappropriation of trade secrets, and breach of fiduciary duty was not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4) and (6). The creditor and the debtor cross-moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rain Bird Corp. v. Milton (In re Milton) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 03, 2006 , LexisNexis #0506-047
LexisNexis Article
Learn More

In re Madison

Dec
29
2005
Ruling
Reasonable attorneys'fees for work related to filing a proof of claim were awarded, but the court required the creditors to show that they were oversecured before the fees were allowed.
Procedural posture

Movant, a chapter 13 trustee, filed an objection in several bankruptcy cases to proofs of claims filed by respondent creditors regarding certain postpetition, preconfirmation fees included in the proofs of claim. The creditors filed responses in each case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Madison Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 29, 2005 , LexisNexis #0206-107
LexisNexis Article
Learn More
Subscribe to %1