Skip to main content

§ 1334(c)

Caires, In re--Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Ruling
Court abstained from hearing and determining the adversary proceeding challenging statecourt foreclosure action because abstention would not impact the administration of thedebtor's Chapter 7 case. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Caires, In re--Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 24, 2021 , LexisNexis #0821-048

Pieterse, In re--Pieterse v. Tyler Donegan Duncan Real Estate Servs.

Ruling
Court abstained from exercising further jurisdiction over the claims asserted in adversaryproceeding where Railworks factors weighed strongly in favor of abstention. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pieterse, In re--Pieterse v. Tyler Donegan Duncan Real Estate Servs. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 28, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-071

Byrnes, In re--Byrnes v. Byrnes

Ruling
Stay of nondischargeability proceeding could not be granted until district court ruled onmotion to withdraw reference. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Byrnes, In re--Byrnes v. Byrnes Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 27, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-070

Foxwood Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n, In re--Foxwood Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n v. 783-C, LLC

Ruling
Mandatory abstention did not apply to core proceeding concerning debtor’s largest asset, andpermissive abstention was not warranted as it would be most efficient for the proceeding toremain in the bankruptcy forum. (Bankr. D.S.C.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Foxwood Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n, In re--Foxwood Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n v. 783-C, LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 05, 2021 , LexisNexis #0621-073

WP Realty Acquisition III LLC, In re--BGFI GP I LLC v. Prieto

Ruling
Motion for abstention from hearing contract proceeding between managing member of debtorand third party denied as it was a core proceeding involving changes in control of debtor thatwould directly impact on the bankruptcy case. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of WP Realty Acquisition III LLC, In re--BGFI GP I LLC v. Prieto Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 30, 2021 , LexisNexis #0521-073

Miami Metals I, Inc., In re--Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. v. Crowe LLP

Ruling
Court exercised mandatory from professional negligence action brought by debtor's lendersagainst debtor's auditors. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Mandatory Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Miami Metals I, Inc., In re--Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. v. Crowe LLP Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 24, 2021 , LexisNexis #0521-050

Miami Metals I, Inc., In re--Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. v. Crowe LLP

Ruling
Court exercised mandatory from professional negligence action brought by debtor's lendersagainst debtor's auditors. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Mandatory Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Miami Metals I, Inc., In re--Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. v. Crowe LLP Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 24, 2021 , LexisNexis #0521-050

Eight-115 Assocs., LLC, In re--Harlem Multifamily LLC v. Eight-115 Assocs., LLC

Ruling
Mandatory abstention exercised with respect to state law guaranty claim that was timelyfiled. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Mandatory Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Eight-115 Assocs., LLC, In re--Harlem Multifamily LLC v. Eight-115 Assocs., LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 16, 2021 , LexisNexis #0521-022

McAnally, In re--McAnally v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC

Ruling
Court deemed that it should abstain from hearing the instant proceeding where relevantfactors overwhelmingly weighed in favor of abstention. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McAnally, In re--McAnally v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 30, 2020 , LexisNexis #0121-075

JTS Trucking LLC, In re--Atl. Southern Contr., Inc. v. JTS Trucking LLC

Ruling
Mandatory abstention applied to trespass claim against debtor. (Bankr. N.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Mandatory Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of JTS Trucking LLC, In re--Atl. Southern Contr., Inc. v. JTS Trucking LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 04, 2020 , LexisNexis #1220-074