Skip to main content

§ 1334(c)

Podkolzin v. Amboy Bus. Co.

Ruling
Personal injury action that was removed to district court for district where injury occurred transferred back to bankruptcy court for abstention determination.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, a driver and an individual, filed an action against defendants, a bus owner and an operator, to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services in a state court. The owner filed for chapter 11 protection. The bankruptcy court for the Southern District of New York permitted the driver to remove the case to the instant court. Plaintiffs filed a notice to remove. Plaintiffs moved to remand the case to the state court.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Podkolzin v. Amboy Bus. Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 13, 2009 , LexisNexis #0409-105

First Natl Bank v. Texas (In re Renaissance Hosp.-Grand Prairie Inc.)

Ruling
Court abstained from hearing adversary proceeding based on state labor laws.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bank filed an adversary proceeding against defendant Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) and debtors, seeking a determination that a transfer the bank made to the debtors from various accounts did not violate the Texas Labor Code. The TWC moved to dismiss the bank's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of First Natl Bank v. Texas (In re Renaissance Hosp.-Grand Prairie Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 17, 2009 , LexisNexis #0409-019

Florida Dev. Assocs. v. Knezevich & Assocs. (In re Fla. Dev. Assocs.)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court exercised discretion to abstain from hearing construction contract dispute.
Procedural posture

Chapter 11 debtor filed an adversary proceeding against architects, engineers, and other construction professionals, alleging that they negligently designed and constructed balconies on buildings the debtor erected. The defendants filed motions to dismiss the debtor's action and, alternatively, asked the court to abstain from exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Florida Dev. Assocs. v. Knezevich & Assocs. (In re Fla. Dev. Assocs.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 04, 2009 , LexisNexis #0409-140

Best Ins. Servs. Inc. v. Wells (In re Wells)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from state law liability determination.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an adversary proceeding against defendant debtor seeking a determination that its debt was nondischargeable. The debt was unliquidated and was the subject of a pending state court proceeding. The debtor filed a counterclaim which was essentially the same as that filed in the state court action. The creditor requested that the court abstain from hearing the counterclaim on the basis that it was founded solely on state law.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Best Ins. Servs. Inc. v. Wells (In re Wells) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 30, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-092

In re Radetic

Ruling
Bankruptcy court voluntarily abstained from hearing contract dispute related to debtor's bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

Creditor filed a motion for relief from the automatic stay to proceed against the debtor in a state court action filed prepetition. The action arose from a failed real estate contract. The creditor, as listing agent, sought a commission from the debtor. The stay motion in effect called on the bankruptcy court to abstain from determining the breach of contract dispute.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Radetic Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 16, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-024

Joremi Enters. v. Hershkowitz (In re New 118th LLC)

Ruling
Guarantee dispute remanded pursuant to mandatory abstention once established that the matter would not affect administration.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff investors brought an action in state court against defendants: debtor, three individuals, et al. After that court ordered relief against the affiliated debtors, plaintiffs removed the action to district court which referred it to the instant court. Plaintiffs assigned the proceeds of their claims to debtors'estates, and filed an amended complaint, which dropped all defendants other than the individuals, one of which moved to remand.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Joremi Enters. v. Hershkowitz (In re New 118th LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 13, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-091

Schwab v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. (In re Bowler)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from hearing trustee's claims regarding secured status of creditor's claim and alleged violations of Truth in Lending Act.
Procedural posture

Defendant lender filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff trustee's adversary complaint to determine that the creditor did not have a secured interest in the debtors'property subject to a mortgage and for damages under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schwab v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. (In re Bowler) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 14, 2008 , LexisNexis #0109-027

Smith v. McLeskey (In re Bay Vista of Va. Inc.)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court declined to abstain from proceeding for turnover of excess funds received by creditor in foreclosure of debtor's property.
Procedural posture

Defendants, creditors of a chapter 7 debtor, moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334 for abstention of the complaint filed by plaintiff chapter 7 trustee, which sought a turnover pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 542 of excess funds collected by the creditors on certain notes, alleged a breach of contract, and alleged that the creditors were judicially estopped from collecting an amount in excess of what they represented to a state court was owed them.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Smith v. McLeskey (In re Bay Vista of Va. Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 24, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-019

Estate of Smith v. Columbia Prop. Group

Ruling
Discretionary abstention appropriate for medical malpractice case in which a co-defendant had filed for bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff estate filed the instant wrongful death, medical malpractice action in a state court. One of the defendants removed the action to federal court. The matter was before the court upon the estate's motion for abstention and remand.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Estate of Smith v. Columbia Prop. Group Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 22, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-057

White Oak Corp. v. American Intl Group Inc. (In re National Eastern Corp.)

Ruling
Proceeding against debtor contractor's sureties and attorneys for acting in self-interest under indemnity agreement remanded to state court.
Procedural posture

One plaintiff and one defendant (objecting parties) filed motions to abstain and to remand to state court the captioned adversary proceeding, which had been removed to the bankruptcy court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1452(a). The basis of the complaint was that defendants, sureties and attorneys, rather than acting on the behalf of the plaintiffs, the debtor and its affiliates under an indemnity agreement, acted in their own self-interest.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of White Oak Corp. v. American Intl Group Inc. (In re National Eastern Corp.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 25, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-088