Skip to main content

§ 1334

Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP, In re--Faulkner v. Lane Grorman Trubitt, LLC

Ruling
Equitable remand of a bankruptcy civil proceeding was appropriate as there was no longer abankruptcy estate to administer, a liquidating plan had been confirmed and comity weighedin favor of abstention and remand. (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP, In re--Faulkner v. Lane Grorman Trubitt, LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 13, 2021 , LexisNexis #1221-046

Parameter, In re--Parmenter v. Wilmington Sav. Fund. Soc. FSB

Ruling
Bankruptcy court was without jurisdiction in adversary proceeding as the real propertydescribed in the complaint was abandoned pursuant to a prior order and at the time the planwas confirmed, it was not property of the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. D. Or.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Proceedings Arising Under or Arising In

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Parameter, In re--Parmenter v. Wilmington Sav. Fund. Soc. FSB Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 20, 2021 , LexisNexis #1121-046

Rivera, In re

Ruling
Court lacked jurisdiction to reopen case to strip the second mortgage from the condo thathad vested in debtor upon chapter 13 plan confirmation. (Bankr. S.D. Fla.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Proceedings Arising Under or Arising In

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rivera, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 16, 2021 , LexisNexis #1021-023

KC7 Ranch, Ltd., In re--Ahern v. Griggs

Ruling
Permissive abstention and equitable remand were appropriate as there would have been noeffect on the efficient administration of the bankruptcy estate if the court abstained. (Bankr.N.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of KC7 Ranch, Ltd., In re--Ahern v. Griggs Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 10, 2021 , LexisNexis #1021-098

Hall, In re--Hall v. Hall

Ruling
Permissive abstention was warranted because issues as to whether a partnership existedunder state law and the rights of partners were plainly not exclusive to bankruptcy law.(Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hall, In re--Hall v. Hall Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 21, 2021 , LexisNexis #0921-024

Caires, In re--Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Ruling
Court abstained from hearing and determining the adversary proceeding challenging statecourt foreclosure action because abstention would not impact the administration of thedebtor's Chapter 7 case. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Caires, In re--Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 24, 2021 , LexisNexis #0821-048

Chesapeake Energy Corp., In re--CTF, Ltd. v. Encino Energy, L.L.C.

Ruling
Motion to abstain was granted in part as there existed "related to" jurisdiction in the court overthe assignee's claims against the debtor, because the severed action continued to be related tothe debtor's bankruptcy. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chesapeake Energy Corp., In re--CTF, Ltd. v. Encino Energy, L.L.C. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 02, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-097

Pieterse, In re--Pieterse v. Tyler Donegan Duncan Real Estate Servs.

Ruling
Court abstained from exercising further jurisdiction over the claims asserted in adversaryproceeding where Railworks factors weighed strongly in favor of abstention. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pieterse, In re--Pieterse v. Tyler Donegan Duncan Real Estate Servs. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 28, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-071

Byrnes, In re--Byrnes v. Byrnes

Ruling
Stay of nondischargeability proceeding could not be granted until district court ruled onmotion to withdraw reference. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Byrnes, In re--Byrnes v. Byrnes Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 27, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-070

Foxwood Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n, In re--Foxwood Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n v. 783-C, LLC

Ruling
Mandatory abstention did not apply to core proceeding concerning debtor’s largest asset, andpermissive abstention was not warranted as it would be most efficient for the proceeding toremain in the bankruptcy forum. (Bankr. D.S.C.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Foxwood Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n, In re--Foxwood Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n v. 783-C, LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 05, 2021 , LexisNexis #0621-073