Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge drake

Brown v. Steel Capital LLC (In re Brown)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over non-core proceedings not related to debtor's bankruptcy.
Issue(s)
Did the bankruptcy court have subject matter jurisdiction over debtor's proceeding contesting creditor's secured status with regard to real property against which the creditor had been allowed to proceed pursuant to the granting of its motion for relief from stay?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Brown v. Steel Capital LLC (In re Brown) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 18, 2013 , LexisNexis #0314-102

In re Holmes

Ruling
Debtor's attorney sanctioned for reliance on assurances of non-lawyer employee to detriment of debtor.
Issue(s)
Should debtor's attorney be sanctioned for providing improper advice regarding the sale of property and dismissal of the case and for allowing paralegal to exercise duties and responsibilities belong solely to attorneys.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Holmes Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 11, 2013 , LexisNexis #0913-140

In re Mack

Ruling
Objection to confirmation based on failure to include non-debtor spouse's income in current monthly income calculation overruled.
Procedural posture

Before the court was the issue of confirmation of debtor's chapter 13 plan. The chapter 13 Trustee objected to confirmation and also sought dismissal of the case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mack Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 11, 2012 , LexisNexis #0213-028

In re ONeal

Ruling
Plan could be confirmed over objection of former spouse where claim was for property settlement, not alimony, and could be compromised.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and proposed a plan for paying his creditors. The debtor's ex-wife filed an objection to confirmation of the debtor's plan and asked the court to dismiss the debtor's case for "cause," pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1307(c), claiming that the debtor declared chapter 13 bankruptcy and filed his bankruptcy plan in bad faith. The court held a hearing on the ex-wife's claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re ONeal Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 18, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-133

In re Nittolo

Ruling
Relief from stay granted to allow purchaser of real estate at foreclosure to enforce rights under state law.
Procedural posture

Movant, the servicer for a creditor of a chapter 11 debtor, asked the court for relief from stay per 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(d) for cause, thereby permitting movant to use a "lock out" to recover possession of real estate that it had purchased at a foreclosure sale that had occurred under an order granting relief from stay in a prior bankruptcy case of debtor, one of three cases filed by her in 2009 and 2010. Debtor opposed relief.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nittolo Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 16, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-110

Moore v. Delta Cmty. Credit Union (In re Moore)

Ruling
Reconsideration of order resolving adversary proceeding granted on grounds of excusable neglect and limited delay or prejudice.
Procedural posture

Before the court was the Motion to Reconsider the Court's Final Order Resolving the Adversary Proceeding filed by defendant creditor. Plaintiff debtors opposed the Motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moore v. Delta Cmty. Credit Union (In re Moore) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 06, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-139

In re Minnix Constr. Inc.

Ruling
Debtor's accounting firm, which was not employed by trustee, held a general unsecured claim for fees.
Procedural posture

The chapter 7 trustee objected to a priority unsecured claim filed by claimant, an accounting firm that had provided services to debtor both before and after the filing of debtor's chapter 7 case. At issue was whether the claim was properly classified as a priority unsecured claim or if, as urged by the trustee, some part of it was properly allowed as an unsecured claim and some part was properly disallowed in its entirety.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Minnix Constr. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 20, 2011 , LexisNexis #0412-139

In re Freeman

Ruling
Debtor's attorneys' fees allowed as reasonable with small adjustments for time spent by junior associates.
Procedural posture

Before the court was the application for compensation filed by a law firm, as debtor's counsel. In the Application, the firm sought approval of $42,348 in fees and expenses. Debtor responded to the application, essentially arguing that the amount billed by the firm was not reasonable.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Freeman Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 29, 2011 , LexisNexis #0212-038

In re Buchanan

Ruling
Creditor with notice who did not file proof of claim by bar date not entitled to second priority payment.
Procedural posture

Before the court was a Request for Consideration and Inclusion in Final Settlement and Compensation, filed by an unsecured claimant.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Buchanan Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 11, 2011 , LexisNexis #0212-060

Castillo v. Three Aces Auto Sales (In re Castillo)

Ruling
Damages awarded for creditor's violation of stay by refusing to turn over vehicle repossessed just prior to petition date.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtors filed a motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(k), seeking an award of actual damages, attorney's fees, and punitive damages against respondent creditor for a willful violation of the automatic stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Castillo v. Three Aces Auto Sales (In re Castillo) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 25, 2011 , LexisNexis #0911-077