Skip to main content

Picard v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Picard v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Ruling
Common law claims against entities that benefitted from Madoff Ponzi scheme were not property of the estate but of defrauded creditors.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff liquidation trustee sued defendants, banks and investment funds, for claims that included aiding and abetting fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and unjust enrichment. Defendants moved to dismiss for lack of standing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Picard v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 01, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-083