Skip to main content

§ 524(e)

In re Pilgrims Pride Corp.

Ruling
Plan ordered modified to exclude protections for third parties but retain the court's jurisdiction over suits against those third parties which would have been covered by the plan's third-party protections.
Procedural posture

Before the court was the debtors' amended joint plan of reorganization under chapter 11. Numerous parties objected to language in Articles VIII and X of the plan which purported to protect certain third parties against claims and causes of action arising from claims against them that arose prior to or during the pendency of the chapter 11 cases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pilgrims Pride Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 14, 2010 , LexisNexis #0210-057

United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Weishorn

Ruling
Insurer of debtor's subcontractor did not have standing to contest motion to lift stay for action based on worker's injuries.
Procedural posture

Appellant insurer challenged the bankruptcy court's ruling that the insurer did not have standing to contest appellee worker's motion to lift stay, and the court's order lifting stay and modifying the injunction that was barring the worker's separate superior court claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Weishorn Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 14, 2009 , LexisNexis #1209-013

Murphy v. Weathers

Ruling
Debtor's former CEO's objection to exculpation and indemnification provisions of chapter 11 plan properly overruled.
Procedural posture

Appellant, the former chief executive of the debtor, challenged an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia, that overruled his objections to confirmation of the Chapter 11 plan filed by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, that included exculpation and indemnification provisions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Murphy v. Weathers Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 25, 2008 , LexisNexis #1008-119

In re Wool Growers Cent. Storage Co.

Ruling
Plan confirmation denied due to non-consnsual release of debtor's directors from liablity to creditors in exchange for contributions.
Procedural posture

A corporate bankruptcy debtor's chapter 11 reorganization plan provided that, in exchange for a contribution of funds by the debtor's directors, claims of creditors against the directors, both individually and as board members, were released. Certain unsecured creditors objected to confirmation of the plan on the ground that the release was improper.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wool Growers Cent. Storage Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 19, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-007