Skip to main content

§ 507(a)(8)

Karamoussayan, In re--Karamoussayan v. Mass. Dep't of Revenue

Ruling
Appeal was dismissed as the debtor failed to establish that he had been directly and adverselyharmed by the bankruptcy court order. (B.A.P. 1st Cir.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Karamoussayan, In re--Karamoussayan v. Mass. Dep't of Revenue Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 11, 2024 , LexisNexis #0624-034

Juntoff, In re--IRS v. Juntoff

Ruling
Shared responsibility payment required by 26 U.S.C. § 5000A(b) amounted to a tax where thepayment had several tax-like qualities. (6th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Juntoff, In re--IRS v. Juntoff Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 31, 2023 , LexisNexis #0923-087

Imperial Frozen Foods Op Co., LLC, In re

Ruling
Internal Revenue Service's second amended claim denied as the IRS did not meet its burden of establishing validity. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Imperial Frozen Foods Op Co., LLC, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 03, 2023 , LexisNexis #0623-084

United States v. Alicea

Ruling
Shared responsibility payment operated as a tax collected by the IRS as part of the regularincome tax filing process and was entitled to priority claim status. (4th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States v. Alicea Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 19, 2023 , LexisNexis #0323-034

Clardy, In re

Ruling
Creditor's claim for unemployment compensation overpayment was not entitled to prioritystatus. (Bankr. W.D. Ky.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Clardy, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 01, 2022 , LexisNexis #0123-083

Harris, In re

Ruling
City did not meet its burden of proving that claims for municipal charges and late penaltieswere property taxes entitled to priority status. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harris, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 22, 2022 , LexisNexis #1122-080

Peete, In re

Ruling
Special charges added to the debtor's tax bill by the city water works were not entitled topriority status as the city failed to provide any evidence to establish the nature and purpose ofthe charges imposed. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Peete, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 30, 2022 , LexisNexis #0822-058

Szczyporski, In re

Ruling
Individual mandate payment was a tax for bankruptcy purposes as it was an involuntarypecuniary burden upon individuals who failed to maintain minimum health insurancecoverage. (3d Cir.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims; Tax on Income or

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Szczyporski, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 11, 2022 , LexisNexis #0722-007

Juntoff, In re--IRS v. Juntoff

Ruling
Court erred in finding that the shared responsibility payment for failing to obtain healthinsurance was not a tax measured by income as the SRP was calculated as a percentage ofhousehold income. (B.A.P. 6th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Juntoff, In re--IRS v. Juntoff Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 21, 2022 , LexisNexis #0522-035

Creative Hairdressers, Inc., In re

Ruling
Employer shared responsibility payment was an excise tax entitled to priority as it was aninvoluntary burden imposed by Congress. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Unsecured Governmental Claims; Excise Tax.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Creative Hairdressers, Inc., In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 03, 2022 , LexisNexis #0422-081