Skip to main content

§ 329(a)

In re Egwu

Ruling
Debtor's former attorney's fees ordered disgorged due to failure to disclose fee sharing arrangement.
Procedural posture

Debtor's former attorney filed an application for attorneys' fees per 11 U.S.C.S. § 503(a) and an objection to confirmation of the debtor's chapter 13 plan because it did not propose to pay any of the fees the attorney sought to recover.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Egwu Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-075

In re Kim

Ruling
Debtor's attorney ordered to disgorge portion of fees deemed not reasonable.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a trustee was appointed to administer the debtor's case. The trustee asked the court to determine the reasonableness of fees the debtor paid to his attorney and sought an order which required the debtor's counsel to disgorge fees the court found were unreasonable. The court held a hearing on the trustee's motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kim Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 06, 2012 , LexisNexis #1012-038

In re McCorvey

Ruling
Debtor's attorneys' fees ordered disgorged as excessive and due to failure to comply with disclosure requirements.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee filed a motion seeking disgorgement of fees paid to an attorney and/or his law firm and to a bankruptcy petition preparer. The UST also sought to enjoin the attorney and the petition preparer from preparing any bankruptcy petition in the Northern District of Ohio and to enjoin the attorney from practicing law in the Northern District of Ohio without being properly admitted.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McCorvey Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 25, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-110

In re South Station LLC

Ruling
Debtor's attorneys' fees disallowed due to failure to disclose payments from debtor's principal.
Procedural posture

Law firm representing a debtor filed an application for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 329 and 330 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016. The chapter 7 trustee filed an objection to the application on the grounds that the law firm failed to comply with the disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re South Station LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 13, 2011 , LexisNexis #0112-040

In re Gluth Bros. Constr. Inc.

Ruling
Debtor's law firm ordered to disgorge large portion of fee due to failure to disclose representation of debtor's largest creditor.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee, joined by the Creditor Trustees on behalf of the liquidating trust formed by the confirmation of the debtor's chapter 11 Plan, objected to the final fee application filed by the Debtor's attorneys (the law firm) and also sought to disgorge the fees previously received by the law firm.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Gluth Bros. Constr. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-039

In re Ball

Ruling
One half of amount of attorneys' fee requested allowed due to late filing of application.
Procedural posture

In a chapter 13 bankruptcy case, counsel for the debtors filed a fee application after failing to timely file a disclosure statement under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016(b).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ball Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 23, 2011 , LexisNexis #0112-041

Garcia v. Miller (In re Garcia)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court order that attorney was not subject to section 329(a) remanded for factual determination.
Procedural posture

Movant debtor sought review of a determination by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois that defendant, an attorney who had represented the debtor prior to the debtor filing bankruptcy, was not subject to 11 U.S.C.S. § 329.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Garcia v. Miller (In re Garcia) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 10, 2011 , LexisNexis #0611-002

In re Jahed

Ruling
Court declined to sanction debtor's former counsel for failure to appear at hearing on debtor's pro se motion for extension of time to obtain new counsel.
Procedural posture

Debtor's counsel was ordered to show cause why sanctions including possible suspension from practice should not be imposed for his failure to appear at a hearing on debtor's motion to extend time to "pursue other legal counsel." The court also considered issues raised by the U.S. Trustee (UST) as to whether the compensation paid to counsel was reasonable per 11 U.S.C.S. § 329(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016(b).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jahed Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 07, 2011 , LexisNexis #0411-038

Rushton v. Woodbury & Kesler PC (In re C.W. Mining Co.)

Ruling
Debtor's attorneys ordered to disgorge fees received from debtor due to acceptance of compensation from companies with competing interests.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 trustee filed an adversary proceedings against defendants, an attorney and the attorney's law firm, seeking an order requiring defendants to disgorge all fees they were paid for work performed on a mining company's bankruptcy case and turnover of documents defendants claimed were privileged. The trustee filed a motion for partial summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rushton v. Woodbury & Kesler PC (In re C.W. Mining Co.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 30, 2010 , LexisNexis #0111-038

DeAngelis v. Geisenberger (In re Ressler Hardwoods & Flooring Inc.)

Ruling
Attorney who did not disclose active involvement in sale of debtor's stock ordered to disgorge fees.
Procedural posture

Movant, the acting United States Trustee (UST) filed a motion to disqualify respondents, a lawyer and his law firm, from acting as counsel to a chapter 7 debtor and to require the disgorgement of the professional fees that the attorney received through the debtor's chapter 11 bankruptcy case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of DeAngelis v. Geisenberger (In re Ressler Hardwoods & Flooring Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 08, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-108