Skip to main content

§ 1328

In re Ward

Ruling
Debtor entitled to discharge in second chapter 13 case filed two years after prior discharge as prohibition period ran from filing date in earlier case.
Procedural posture

The debtors moved to confirm their chapter 13 plan. The chapter 13 trustee filed an objection. The only issue in dispute was whether the debtors were entitled to a chapter 13 discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ward Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 03, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-057

In re Sanders

Ruling
Debtor not entitled to discharge in chapter 13 case filed within four years of chapter 7 discharge.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13, and submitted a proposed plan. The trustee objected to the plan and requested that the debtors not receive a discharge, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sanders Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 18, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-056

In re Bridges

Ruling
Chapter 13 case held open after completion of monthly payments pending payment of personal injury claim also called for under plan.
Procedural posture

A trustee filed a motion to hold a debtor's chapter 13 case open until the personal injury proceeds were paid. The debtor objected that she had completed her monthly payments and was entitled to a discharge.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bridges Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 11, 2007 , LexisNexis #0607-140

Grice v. We Energies

Ruling
Chapter 13 debtor was not eligible for discharge where less than four years had elapsed since discharge in converted chapter 7 case.
Procedural posture

Defendant trustee filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings declaring that plaintiff debtor was not entitled to a discharge in her chapter 13 case, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Grice v. We Energies Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 17, 2007 , LexisNexis #0607-017

Parsons v. Byrd (In re Byrd)

Ruling
Claim arising out of bar fight was not due to willful or malicious injury and was dischargeable.
Procedural posture

Defendant debtor filed for bankruptcy relief under chapter 13, and scheduled plaintiff creditor as having a disputed, unliquidated claim arising out of a bar fight. The creditor filed suit to determine the dischargeability of the debt, seeking a determination that any indebtedness arising as a result of his state court civil case against the debtor, be determined non- dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). Debtor moved to dismiss.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Parsons v. Byrd (In re Byrd) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 01, 2007 , LexisNexis #0407-052

In re Ybarra

Ruling
Debtors were ineligible for discharge in case filed within four years of prior chapter 13 case that was converted to chapter 7.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee sought a determination that chapter 13 debtors'discharge was barred by 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ybarra Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on January 26, 2007 , LexisNexis #0307-056

In re Knighton

Ruling
Debtor eligible for chapter 13 discharge where prior case was filed more than four years earlier although prior discharge after conversion to chapter 7 was less than four years earlier.
Procedural posture

A creditor objected to the confirmation of a debtor's chapter 13 plan on the ground that the debtor proposed it in bad faith based on the date of discharge in her previous chapter 7 case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Knighton Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 19, 2006 , LexisNexis #0207-013

Branigan v. Khan (In re Khan)

Ruling
Prohibition on second discharge did not prevent filing of a chapter 13 petition.
Procedural posture

Appellant, a chapter 13 trustee, sought review of orders of the bankruptcy court denying the trustee's motions to dismiss and confirming the plans of appellee debtors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Branigan v. Khan (In re Khan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 14, 2006 , LexisNexis #0207-012

McDow v. Sours (In re Sours)

Ruling
Objection to discharge sustained as chapter 13 case was filed less than four years after discharge in converted chapter 7 case.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 trustee filed a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), as incorporated into bankruptcy proceedings through Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012, for judgment on the pleadings in his complaint, which objected to debtors'discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McDow v. Sours (In re Sours) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on October 10, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-046

In re West

Ruling
Debtor was eligible for chapter 13 discharge where prior chapter 13 case was filed more than two years earlier.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the debtor's proposed chapter 13 plan. The issue raised by the objection was the proper interpretation of 11 U.S.C. § 1328(f), specifically, whether the time period was measured from the date the discharge was received in the prior case, or from the date the prior case was filed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re West Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on October 10, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-110