Skip to main content

§ 1307

In re Russell

Ruling
Chapter 13 case dismissed as filed in bad faith after creditor's claim was held nondischargeable in chapter 7 case already pending in another jurisdiction.
Procedural posture

After the debtors filed a voluntary chapter 13 petition and an amended plan, a creditor objected to confirmation of the amended plan on the basis that the debtors had not filed the proceeding in good faith, the plan was not proposed in good faith pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3), that all of the debtors' projected disposable income would not be applied to make plan payments pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Russell Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 26, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-103

In re Ragland

Ruling
Court lacked jurisdiction over post-dismissal fee dispute between debtor and counsel.
Procedural posture

In two chapter 13 cases, counsel for debtors filed motions seeking to direct the chapter 13 trustee to pay them, for payment of outstanding legal fees, all funds received by the trustee from the debtors prior to the dismissal of their chapter 13 cases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ragland Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 25, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-103

In re Nelson

Ruling
Order dismissing debtor's chapter 13 case was reversed since debtor was not given opportunity to request additional time to amend plan.
Procedural posture

Appellant bankruptcy debtor proposed a chapter 13 plan, but appellee trustee objected to the plan partly on the basis that the plan proposed only minimal payments with a minimal dividend for creditors. The debtor appealed the order of the Bankruptcy Court of the Northern District of California, which dismissed the debtor's case because the plan was not confirmable.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nelson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on May 15, 2006 , LexisNexis #0606-100

In re Harvin

Ruling
Motion to dismiss was granted due to omissions by debtor in schedules.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13. Interested party, the trustee, filed a motion to dismiss the case with prejudice for three years pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c) for debtor's bad faith failure to disclose assets and the delay in amending his schedules to disclose assets after their discovery.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Harvin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 11, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-103

In re Petty

Ruling
Trustee was denied a dismissal request since the trustee failed to show the debtors filed their plan in bad faith.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the debtors'proposed plan. The basis for the trustee's objection was that the debtors have scheduled monthly charitable contributions, in the form of weekly tithes and offerings to his church, while only paying unsecured creditors approximately one percent of their claims over the life of the plan. The trustee also moved for dismissal of the case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Petty Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 10, 2006 , LexisNexis #0406-063

Wellman v. Salt Creek Valley Bank (In re Wellman)

Ruling
Dismissal of debtors'chapter 13 case was affirmed since a substantial deficit in plan payments showed the debtors had materially defaulted in performing under their plan's terms.
Procedural posture

Debtors appealed from the bankruptcy court's orders: (1) dismissing their chapter 13 case with prejudice; and (2) denying their motion to reconsider the order of dismissal. Appellee was a first lienholder on a parcel of unimproved land adjacent to debtors'residence.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wellman v. Salt Creek Valley Bank (In re Wellman) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on January 26, 2006 , LexisNexis #0206-020

In re Cotton

Ruling
Court denied the debtors their motion to dismiss a chapter 13 case and ruled that the best interests of the creditors were to have the case converted to chapter 7.
Procedural posture

Debtor commenced a chapter 13 case. Before the court were debtor's motion seeking to voluntarily dismiss the case, along with several other matters, to wit: a motion for relief from automatic stay filed on behalf of an estate, a motion for approval of settlement filed on behalf of debtor's former counsel in related state litigation, and the chapter 13 trustee's objection to confirmation of plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cotton Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 23, 2005 , LexisNexis #0306-067

In re Weiss

Ruling
Court granted creditor's motion for conversion to chapter 7 due to debtor's bad faith evidenced by misinformation and nondisclosures.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 bankruptcy debtor supplied inaccurate or incomplete financial information even after amending the debtor's schedules several times. Creditors moved for conversion or dismissal of the debtor's petition pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c) based on the debtor's bad faith in the bankruptcy proceedings and in the debtor's proposed plan of reorganization.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Weiss Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 02, 2005 , LexisNexis #0106-032

In re Howard

Ruling
Nonpayment of filing fees in prior bankruptcy cases was not grounds for dismissing the current case.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a chapter 13 petition. The debtor had filed two previous Chapter 7 bankruptcies, in both of which the debtor failed to pay the required fees, and the cases were dismissed. The debtor owed $335.00 to the court. The bankruptcy clerk asked the court to dismiss the case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(g)(1). The court ordered the debtor to show cause why the case should not be dismissed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Howard Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on October 31, 2005 , LexisNexis #0106-031