Skip to main content

§ 1127(e)

Lovey, In re

Ruling
Debtors were not entitled to a material modification of their Chapter 11 plan that wouldreduce payments to unsecured creditors absent amending disclosures and soliciting votes.(Bankr. D. Idaho)
Issue(s)
Modification of Plan; Where Debtor is an Individual.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lovey, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 19, 2019 , LexisNexis #0719-023

Hanson, In re

Ruling
Debtors' motion for modification of their confirmed chapter 11 plan denied where proposed modification was improper because it altered the value provided for secured creditors under the confirmed plan. (Bankr. E.D. Tenn.)
Issue(s)
Modification of Plan; Where Debtor is an Individual.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hanson, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 26, 2018 , LexisNexis #1118-054

Redding, In re

Ruling
Court denied debtor's motion to modify her chapter 11 plan as speculative change in circumstances was not a substantial change. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
Issue(s)
Modification of Plan; Where Debtor is an Individual.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Redding, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 07, 2017 , LexisNexis #1217-052

In re Evans

Ruling
Debtor could not be ordered to make additional payments to creditor under plan.
Issue(s)
Could debtor be ordered to make additional payments to creditor under confirmed plan?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Evans Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 03, 2015 , LexisNexis #0915-130

In re Sandford

Ruling
Modification of amended plan that would violate prior settlement denied.
Issue(s)
Whether the debtor's motion to modify her third amended chapter 11 plan of reorganization should be granted under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1127(e)(2) to give her additional time to sell her assets and pay creditors, where the debtor previously agreed to convert the case if she did not complete a sale by August 15, 2013.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sandford Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 27, 2013 , LexisNexis #0913-097