Skip to main content

§ 105

In re Bennitt

Ruling
Debtors held in contempt for failure to comply with show cause order.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 trustee applied for an order to show cause why the debtors should not be held in contempt of court for failure to comply with a consent order resolving the U.S. Trustee's order to show cause against the debtors for failure to comply with a consent order requiring turnover of estate assets in the form of insurance proceeds.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bennitt Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 30, 2013 , LexisNexis #0313-001

In re Manstone Countertops LLC

Ruling
Attorney removed as counsel for jointly administered chapter 11 cases due to failure to obey court directives.
Procedural posture

The court entered an order directing an attorney to show cause why he should not be removed as counsel for jointly administered chapter 11 cases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Manstone Countertops LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 17, 2013 , LexisNexis #0213-036

In re Jenkins

Ruling
Debtor awarded damages for former spouse's violation of injunction and stay by having debtor arrested for child support arrearage at § 341 hearing.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 debtor filed a motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 105(a) and 362(h) asking that a county and his former wife be held in civil contempt for violating both a prior order of the court granting an injunction restraining the county and the former wife from taking any action to enforce collection of pre-petition child support arrears and the automatic stay provisions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jenkins Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 02, 2013 , LexisNexis #0113-105

In re Oliver

Ruling
Debtor's attorneys ordered to hire CPA to audit business as a result of seeking to pay filing fee in installments without debtor's authorization.
Procedural posture

In a chapter 13 bankruptcy case, the court issued an order sua sponte which required the debtor's counsel to appear and show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failure to properly represent the debtor. The court instructed the United States Trustee ("UST") to investigate allegations the debtor made against her attorney, instructed the debtor to obtain new counsel, and scheduled a second hearing pending receipt of the UST's report.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Oliver Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 22, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-036

In re Bradley

Ruling
Company and owner held in contempt for failing to comply with wage withholding order.
Procedural posture

The court issued an order to show cause, directing a corporate representative of a management company to appear before the court and show cause why they were not in contempt for failing to comply with the court's wage order directing the company to withhold a certain amount per month from a debtor's wages and to forward those amounts to the chapter 13 trustee.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bradley Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-071

In re Larson

Ruling
Discharged debtor could rescind reaffirmation agreement nunc pro tunc and obtain discharge of debt where creditor repossessed collateral shortly after case was closed.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 7 and asked the court to approve an agreement which reaffirmed a debt he owed to a creditor on a motor vehicle. The court approved the agreement and discharged the debtor on March 13, 2012, and on April 16, 2012, the debtor filed a motion to reopen his bankruptcy case and asked the court to rescind the agreement. The court held hearings on the debtor's motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Larson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 31, 2012 , LexisNexis #1012-071

Malley v. Agin

Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked authority to surcharge debtor's interest in exempt property due to willful concealment of funds.
Procedural posture

Appellant, a debtor in a chapter 7 liquidation proceeding, appealed from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts an order issued in reliance on 11 U.S.C.S. § 105(a) surcharging his interest in property listed as exempt. The debtor challenged the surcharge as exceeding the equitable power granted by § 105(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Malley v. Agin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 15, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-001

Hann v. Educational Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In re Hann)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly sanctioned student loan creditor, with claim valued by court at zero, for ongoing collection efforts.
Procedural posture

Creditor challenged orders from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire that granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff debtor based on the creditor's post-discharge efforts to collect a fully paid student loan obligation, that denied the creditor's cross- motion for summary judgment, and that imposed sanctions on the creditor under 11 U.S.C.S. § 105.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hann v. Educational Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In re Hann) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 07, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-069

In re Nemec

Ruling
Stay could not be extended to cover actions against property owned by debtor's solely owned entity to recover non-consumer debt.
Procedural posture

A creditor sought to modify the automatic stay in order to proceed with a foreclosure petition against property owned by an entity of which a chapter 13 debtor was the sole shareholder. The debtor objected, asserting that a pending buyout of the real estate would benefit the creditor and other creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nemec Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 10, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-001

In re Casseday

Ruling
Debtor's exemptions forfeited on grounds of bad faith.
Procedural posture

In a voluntary chapter 7 case, the Trustee filed an objection to the debtor's exemptions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Casseday Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 10, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-002