Skip to main content

§ 101(14A)

In re LaGrange

Ruling
Monetary judgment for premarital expenditures of debtor's former spouse was not a domestic support obligation.
Procedural posture

Hearing was held on debtors' amended objection to a claim. The debtor's former spouse filed a claim in the amount of $ 26,796 as a domestic support obligation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re LaGrange Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 27, 2009 , LexisNexis #0709-036

In re Siegel

Ruling
Debt that was part of debtor's property settlement with former spouse was not a domestic support obligation and was a general unsecured claim.
Procedural posture

The debtor filed an objection to the $ 50,000 priority claim filed by his former spouse. The issue before the court was whether the claim was for a domestic support obligation as defined in 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(14A), as such was a priority claim that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(a)(2) and § 1325(a)(1), had to be paid in full through the debtor's chapter 13 plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Siegel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 13, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-001

In re Casey

Ruling
Claim for past due child support payments, but not penalty, was a nondischargeable domestic support obligation.
Procedural posture

A creditor, the former spouse of the debtor, filed a proof of claim in the amount of $ 120,000, asserting the claim was secured by a writ of attachment on the debtor's property. The debtor objected to the claim. The issues were the amount of the claim and whether the former spouse sustained the burden of establishing the claim as one for a domestic support obligation, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(14A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Casey Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 19, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-036

Gustin v. Miller (In re Miller)

Ruling
Medical expenses owed by debtor to former spouse pursuant to divorce decree were nondischargeable domestic support obligations.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor, a debtor's former wife, filed a complaint against defendant debtor, the former husband, asserting that a certain debt arising out of an agreed entry concerning modification of child support was nondischargeable. Both parties sought summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gustin v. Miller (In re Miller) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 27, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-036

Smith v. Pritchett (In re Smith)

Ruling
Penalties for late alimony payments were not domestic support obligations and related lien was avoidable.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor challenged the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire's order overruling his objection to the proof of claim filed by appellee, his former spouse, and denying his motion to avoid her lien.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Smith v. Pritchett (In re Smith) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 29, 2008 , LexisNexis #0309-001

Levin v. Greco (In re Greco)

Ruling
Amounts owed to state child representative in debtor's divorce was not a domestic support obligation and was dischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff, an Illinois child representative, brought an adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of defendant debtor's outstanding obligation. The debtor was served with the complaint but had not answered or otherwise appeared in the adversary proceeding, and the representative moved for a default judgment, asserting that the debt was a domestic support obligation, non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(5).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Levin v. Greco (In re Greco) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 20, 2008 , LexisNexis #0209-036

In re Harris

Ruling
Court orders amounting to allocation of marital property were not domestic support obligations.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a chapter 13 plan, and his former spouse objected to the plan on the ground that it failed to provide for payment of certain indebtedness, which she asserted was a domestic support obligation under 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(14A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Harris Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 26, 2008 , LexisNexis #0908-106

In re Alston

Ruling
Payment of credit card debt called for in separation agreement was a property settlement rather than a "domestic support obligation."
Procedural posture

The debtor's former spouse filed an objection to the confirmation of his chapter 13 plan, and the debtor objected to the claim of the spouse based on a provision in the parties' separation agreement.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Alston Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 22, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-036

In re Boller

Ruling
Obligations under divorce agreement were not in the nature of support where alimony was specifically waived and other indicia were not present.
Procedural posture

A debtor sought confirmation of a chapter 13 plan. The debtor's former spouse objected to the confirmation on the ground that it failed to provide for payment in full of a domestic support obligation. Although the parties were provided an opportunity to present evidence, the only evidence submitted was the divorce decree which incorporated a compromise agreement signed by the parties.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Boller Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 27, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-071

Wisconsin v. Schauer (In re Schauer)

Ruling
Child care program overpayments owed to state were nondischargeable "domestic support obligations."
Procedural posture

Plaintiff-creditor, the State of Wisconsin, brought an adversary proceeding under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(5) seeking a determination that an obligation owed by the defendant debtor was excepted from the debtor's discharge as a domestic support obligation within the meaning of 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(14A), that was owed to a governmental entity.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wisconsin v. Schauer (In re Schauer) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 13, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-001