Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

northern district of oklahoma

In re Hale-Halsell Co.

Ruling
Creditor's committee's counsel's application for enhanced fee denied.
Procedural posture

Counsel for a committee of unsecured creditors of a chapter 11 debtor filed a motion for approval of its compromise with the United States Trustee, which sought to adjust a fee arrangement under 11 U.S.C.S. § 328(a) to increase the amount of compensation paid to it.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hale-Halsell Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 01, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-057

In re Chalakee

Ruling
Debtors' objections to creditors' proofs of claim for credit card debt overruled.
Procedural posture

Creditors filed proofs of claim asserting that bankruptcy debtors owed credit card debt to the creditors, and the debtors objected to the creditors' claims on the ground that the amounts claimed to be owed were disputed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Chalakee Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 27, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-008

In re Engles

Ruling
Debtors could not obtain revocation of own discharge.
Procedural posture

When a reaffirmation agreement for a vehicle loan was not executed or filed by a creditor, that debt was discharged. The debtors filed a motion for relief from the discharge order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) or (6) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024 and a request for approval of the reaffirmation agreement.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Engles Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 27, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-017

In re Kendall

Ruling
Claim disallowed due to lack of documentary support.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13. The debtors filed an objection to a proof of claim filed for $13,193, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 502. After a hearing, the court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kendall Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 27, 2007 , LexisNexis #0208-004

In re Makres

Ruling
Presumption of abuse did not arise where debtor properly completed Form B22A means test.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 7. The United States Trustee filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2). The court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Makres Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-051

Wieland v. Harvey (In re Harvey)

Ruling
Debtor's failure to disclose assets and material omissions justified denial of discharge but co- debtor spouse was granted a discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff United States Trustee ("UST") objected to the discharge of defendants, a debtor and his co-debtor, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wieland v. Harvey (In re Harvey) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 16, 2007 , LexisNexis #1207-034

In re Callahan

Ruling
Store inventory purchased from lessor was property of the estate.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff trustee sought summary judgment that defendant vendor's repossession of inventory in the possession of debtors was an avoidable preference under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment on a claim that the inventory, which debtors bought from defendant in connection with their lease of his convenience store, was not debtors'"property" under section 547 and that its value was less than the minimum required therein.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Callahan Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 11, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-078

Davis v. Hoserman (In re Hosterman)

Ruling
Hold harmless obligation contained in divorce decree was nondischargeable due to BAPCA elimination of "balancing test."
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor, the former wife of defendant debtor, brought an adversary proceeding to determine whether a hold harmless provision in the parties'decree of divorce, whereby the debtor agreed to hold the former wife harmless as to various credit card debts, constituted a nondischargable obligation of the debtor within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Davis v. Hoserman (In re Hosterman) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-077

Custom Heating & Air Inc. v. Andress (In re Andress)

Ruling
Contractual penalty for debtor's violation of non-compete covenant was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an adversary proceeding against defendant debtor seeking a determination that its debt was nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523. The district court remanded the matter and instructed the bankruptcy court to reassess the damages attributable to loss of goodwill by the creditor as a result of the debtor's willful and malicious conduct.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Custom Heating & Air Inc. v. Andress (In re Andress) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 17, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-129

In re Brown

Ruling
Attorney for debtors in dismissed chapter 12 cases ordered to disgorge fees due to failure to filed application or disclose agreement.
Procedural posture

Before the court was the issue of whether fees paid to the attorney for chapter 12 debtors should be approved postpayment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Brown Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 29, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-096