Skip to main content

Perez v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. (In re Perez)

Perez v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. (In re Perez)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly held that creditor did not violate the automatic stay by announcing second postponement of foreclosure sale. (B.A.P. 1st Cir.)
Issue(s)
Whether the bankruptcy court erred in concluding the creditor did not violate the automatic stay when it announced the second postponement of its foreclosure post-petition.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Perez v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. (In re Perez) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 28, 2016 , LexisNexis #1016-108