Skip to main content

Tronox, In re--Waleski v. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP

Tronox, In re--Waleski v. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP

Ruling
Mandatory abstention was inapplicable to a legal malpractice proceeding as dispute betweenparties did not exist outside of the bankruptcy cases. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Procedures; Reference of Cases and Proceedings by District Court to Bankruptcy

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tronox, In re--Waleski v. Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 18, 2019 , LexisNexis #0919-074