Skip to main content

In re Jackson

In re Jackson

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly held that "loss of future earnings" refers only to postpetition future earnings.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtors challenged an order from a bankruptcy court, which found that the term "loss of future earnings" as used in 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(d)(11)(E) referred only to post- bankruptcy petition future earnings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jackson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 03, 2008 , LexisNexis #0908-136