Skip to main content

Scrivner v. Mashburn (In re Scrivner)

Scrivner v. Mashburn (In re Scrivner)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not have authority to approve surcharge for postpetition distribution of television revenues.
Procedural posture

Appellants, debtors who disclosed in their petition but did not claim as exempt an interest in television program revenues, appealed the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (BAP), affirming a bankruptcy court's authorization post-discharge of a surcharge for post-petition distributions of the revenues, and the BAP's refusal to decide whether the debtors' distributions were exempt.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Scrivner v. Mashburn (In re Scrivner) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 08, 2008 , LexisNexis #0908-018