Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLC
Jun
26
2009
Ruling
Legal malpractice claim arising out of debtor's bankruptcy properly removed.
Procedural posture
In a legal malpractice case, appellant former client sought judicial review of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia's denial of its motion to remand and entry of summary judgment in favor of appellee law firm and various attorneys. The case had been removed under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(b), so-called arising in bankruptcy jurisdiction, and summary judgment had been granted under the doctrine of res judicata.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available