Skip to main content

In re Harris

In re Harris

Ruling
Fee shifts for non-compliance with amended Rule 3001 could not be applied retroactively.
Procedural posture

Debtors sought to impose fees against claimants for noncompliance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001. Each attempt at fee shifting was incorporated into a claim objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Harris Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 05, 2013 , LexisNexis #0613-140