Skip to main content

Rogan v. Vanderbilt Mortg. & Fin. Inc. (In re Dorsey)

Rogan v. Vanderbilt Mortg. & Fin. Inc. (In re Dorsey)

Ruling
Mortgage could be avoided in absence of valid underlying note.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 trustee and a creditor assignee of debtors' mortgage, filed cross- motions for summary judgment on the trustee's complaint alleging that the assignee's interest in the real property was avoidable pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 544 because the assignee was not entitled to enforce the note on the petition date. The assignee argued it had a properly perfected mortgage.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rogan v. Vanderbilt Mortg. & Fin. Inc. (In re Dorsey) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 07, 2013 , LexisNexis #0613-059