Skip to main content

Nibbelink v. Wells Fargo Bank (In re Nibbelink)

Nibbelink v. Wells Fargo Bank (In re Nibbelink)

Ruling
Bank that knowingly violated discharge injunction held liable for punitive damages.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtors filed an adversary proceeding against bank, seeking damages for violation of a discharge injunction. Specifically, the debtors sought damages for overcharges to their account, damages for mental and emotional distress, punitive damages, attorney's fees, the removal of adverse entries from their credit bureau reports, and a daily fine. The court held an evidentiary hearing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nibbelink v. Wells Fargo Bank (In re Nibbelink) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 11, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-058