Skip to main content

In re Marti

In re Marti

Ruling
Confirmation of chapter 13 plan denied due to doubts that debtor could make large lump sum payment.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed his second amended chapter 13 plan and the trustee objected, stating essentially that the debtor had the financial ability to increase the monthly plan payment in order to pay a sufficient amount into the plan to pay all claims in full without the need for a lump sum payment at an indeterminate date in the future.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Marti Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 02, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-130