Skip to main content

In re Tezla

In re Tezla

Ruling
Repeated automated collection calls were willful violations of stay for which debtor was awarded punitive damages.
Procedural posture

The debtor moved for contempt against a collection agency pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(k).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Tezla Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 28, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-043