Skip to main content

Hogil Pharm. Corp. v. Sapir (In re Innomed Labs LLC)

Hogil Pharm. Corp. v. Sapir (In re Innomed Labs LLC)

Ruling
Law firm that previously represented co-owner of debtor LLC could represent trustee where co-owner did not hold adverse interest to estate.
Procedural posture

Appellants, a pharmaceutical corporation and one of its co-owners, challenged an order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court authorizing appellee, a chapter 7 trustee of a debtor, to retain special legal counsel to investigate and possibly litigate claims by the debtor against appellants. Appellants argued that the law firm appointed as counsel to the trustee held interests adverse to the estate and was not disinterested.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hogil Pharm. Corp. v. Sapir (In re Innomed Labs LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 29, 2008 , LexisNexis #0208-092