Skip to main content

Raddison Design Mgmt. v. Cummins

Raddison Design Mgmt. v. Cummins

Ruling
State law governing contractual non-assignment provisions did not bar assignment of contract through Canadian bankruptcy asset sale.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff, the purchaser of a bankrupt Canadian subcontractor's assets, filed a suit against defendant general contractor, seeking to enforce the subcontractor's rights under a contract with the contractor. The contractor moved to dismiss the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He contended that the purchaser could not assert claims under the executory contract because the contract contained an enforceable non-assignment provision.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Raddison Design Mgmt. v. Cummins Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 03, 2008 , LexisNexis #0108-117