Skip to main content

IndyMac Bank F.S.B. v. Mitchell (In re Mitchell)

IndyMac Bank F.S.B. v. Mitchell (In re Mitchell)

Ruling
Summary judgment was denied to a creditor claiming loan obligation nondischargeability since the creditor presented insufficient evidence regarding alleged false statements in the loan application and reliance on these statements.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an adversary proceeding against defendant debtor, claiming that the debtor's obligation under a construction loan entered into between the debtor and the creditor was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(2)(B), or (a)(6). The creditor filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of IndyMac Bank F.S.B. v. Mitchell (In re Mitchell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 16, 2005 , LexisNexis #0106-082