Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge humphrey

Moore, In re

Ruling
Creditor was not prejudiced by lack of opportunity to file proof of claim in a no asset case.(Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Debts Not Duly Listed or Scheduled.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moore, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 23, 2023 , LexisNexis #1023-086

Roddy, In re

Ruling
Court approval of a reaffirmation agreement that excluded certain terms included in the creditor's offer to reaffirm was not warranted as the court could not impose terms of that agreement by judicial fiat. (Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Effect of Discharge; Reaffirmation Agreements.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roddy, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 05, 2023 , LexisNexis #0723-035

Johnson, In re

Ruling
Relief constituted a modification of the automatic stay as it was limited, carefully tailored and necessary to preserve the status quo and the debtor's and IRS's respective claimed interests in the accounts at issue. (Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Johnson, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 27, 2023 , LexisNexis #0623-082

Dillahunt, In re

Ruling
Sealing of settlement motion regarding the debtor's share in a mass lawsuit settlement was notwarranted as it did not contain confidential commercial information. (Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Public Access to Papers.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dillahunt, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 15, 2022 , LexisNexis #0223-049

Kubinsky, In re--Kubinsky v. Leduc

Ruling
Debtor's ex-spouse held an equitable property interest in the thrift savings plan to the extentdebtor agreed to transfer it to her in the marital settlement agreement. (Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Domestic Support Obligations.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kubinsky, In re--Kubinsky v. Leduc Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 06, 2022 , LexisNexis #1222-083

Dewitt, In re

Ruling
Mortgagee did not violate the discharge injunction by failing to properly credit plan paymentsas there was no evidence that the mortgagee credited any plan-provided maintenance to thereal estate taxes advance instead of the monthly mortgage payment. (Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Effect of Discharge; Avoidance And Injunctive Relief.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dewitt, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 30, 2022 , LexisNexis #1222-040

Buchholz, In re

Ruling
Motion to recuse or disqualify denied as counsel's belief that he was entitled to the full nolook fee in all Chapter 13 cases was not a justification for a collateral attack on a court'sdecision. (Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Disqualification of Justice, Judge, or Magistrate [Judge].

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Buchholz, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 01, 2022 , LexisNexis #1122-097

Spurlock, In re

Ruling
Debtor's counsel was not entitled to a fee award of the maximum amount under the applicablea no-look fee structure as reasonable compensation for the case resulted in a lesser award.(Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Compensation of Officers.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Spurlock, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 01, 2022 , LexisNexis #0922-052

Pochron, In re

Ruling
Attorney fees were awarded in part as some of the services were unnecessary and some of thetime itemizations were too vague and ambiguous to justify the award of fees. (Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Compensation of Officers.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pochron, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 08, 2022 , LexisNexis #0622-028

Henson, In re

Ruling
Law firm was not entitled to additional fees for post-confirmation services as the firm billedall work at the attorney rate rather than utilizing paralegals or clerical staff when possible.(Bankr. S.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Compensation of Officers; Determination of Amount.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Henson, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 25, 2022 , LexisNexis #0422-052