Judge Gustafson

Ohio Dept of Job & Family Servs. V. Urbina (In re Urbina)

Ruling: 
State's claim for unemployment overpayments was nondischargeable due to fraud and willful and malicious injury.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ohio Dept of Job & Family Servs. V. Urbina (In re Urbina). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 08,2014, LexisNexis #1114-018

In re Blumensaadt

Ruling: 
Recusal of judge who had served as chapter 13 trustee in debtor's prior case denied.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Blumensaadt. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 08,2014, LexisNexis #1014-031

American Express Centurion Bank v. Arrington (In re Arrington)

Ruling: 
Debt was nondischargeable due to debtor's misrepresentations regarding line of credit.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of American Express Centurion Bank v. Arrington (In re Arrington). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 08,2014, LexisNexis #0814-010

In re Hawkins

When movant, a chapter 11 debtor, sought confirmation of a proposed plan of reorganization, a lender with a $5.103 million claim secured by mortgages and by interests in timber and rents from real estate owned by debtor objected to confirmation on the basis that, contrary to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129, the plan lacked feasibility, was not proposed in good faith, and did not provide adequate means of implementation.
Ruling: 
Confirmation of plan dependent on sale of real estate denied on feasibility grounds.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hawkins. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 22,2013, LexisNexis #0313-127

Maxwell v. Novell Inc. (In re matchFirst Inc.)

Plaintiff, a chapter 7 trustee, moved for judgment on the pleadings on an adversary complaint against defendant creditor which sought an order per 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(b) subordinating defendant's claim for $100 million in "damages" in connection with a failed business venture with debtor. At issue was whether the claim concerned a purchase of debtor's stock or was one for damages for breach of underlying agreements with debtor.
Ruling: 
Claim for fraud in stock purchase subordinated.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Maxwell v. Novell Inc. (In re matchFirst Inc.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on June 23,2010, LexisNexis #0910-068

Pages

Subscribe to Judge Gustafson