Northern District

In re Hardacre

A bankruptcy debtor proposed a chapter 13 plan that provided no return to her unsecured creditors. The trustee objected to confirmation of the plan on the ground that the debtor impermissibly deducted her mortgage and car loan expenses twice under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2)(A)(i) in calculating her disposable income.
Ruling: 
Plan confirmation was denied since the debtor had made a double deduction for mortgage and car loan expenses in calculating projected disposable income.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hardacre. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Sec. Bank v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez)

Plaintiff bank filed an adversary proceeding against defendant debtor, claiming that the debtor's obligation to the bank should be declared nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (B). The bank filed a motion for summary judgment.
Ruling: 
Bank was denied summary judgment since the debtor's alleged fraudulent intent was at issue.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sec. Bank v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

County of Dallas v. Baldwin (In re Baldwin)

Plaintiff county sued defendant debtors, seeking to except from discharge its claim based on a state court nunc pro tunc order to help defer the costs for placement of the debtors'adopted daughter with the county. The bankruptcy court held a trial.
Ruling: 
County's claim for payments to help defer the costs for placement of the debtors'adopted daughter with the county were deemed dischargeable since the support-like payments were not owed to a spouse, former spouse, or a child.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of County of Dallas v. Baldwin (In re Baldwin). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Moates

Debtors in two bankruptcy cases submitted to the court the question of whether they were required under 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1)(B)(v), as individual debtors whose debts were primarily business debts, to file a statement of current monthly income. The question was before the court for decision.
Ruling: 
Debtors whose debts were not primarily consumer debts were not required to file a statement of current monthly income as the filing of schedules I and J provided redundant information and, thus, satisfied that requirement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Moates. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Mirant Corp. v. S. Co.

The bankruptcy court recommended that the reference not be withdrawn as to an adversary proceeding filed by the jointly administered chapter 11 debtors and a creditors committee against defendant, one debtor's prior parent corporation, that asserted core and non-core claims under 28 U.S.C. § 157. The parent, who had requested a jury trial, had also requested transfer to Georgia after withdrawal.
Ruling: 
Motion for withdrawal of a reference was granted since the action was more in the nature of a non-core proceeding than a core proceeding.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mirant Corp. v. S. Co.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Art Midwest Inc.

Claimants moved to dismiss the debtor's bankruptcy case as a bad faith filing. The court granted the motion to dismiss. The debtor moved for a new trial or for the court to amend and supplement its findings. The debtor also moved for a new trial on the debtor's objections to the claims and to sell its assets free and clear of liens and encumbrances.
Ruling: 
Court rejected the debtor's objection that the claimants who were granted a motion to dismiss the debtor's case as a bad faith filing lacked standing since one was a creditor and the others were parties in interest.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Art Midwest Inc.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Buckeye Retirement Co. LLC Ltd. v. Bullough (In re Bullough)

Plaintiff judgment creditor brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtor, alleging that a discharge was not warranted under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(3), (4) and (5) based on the debtor's false oaths in his schedules and statements, the debtor's failure to maintain adequate records, and the debtor's failure to account for a significant asset. The bankruptcy court conducted a trial.
Ruling: 
Discharge denied due to sophisticated debtor's false oaths and failure to keep adequate records.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Buckeye Retirement Co. LLC Ltd. v. Bullough (In re Bullough). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Gonzalez

In a voluntary bankruptcy case, debtor presented her chapter 13 plan to the court for confirmation. Two creditors objected to the plan and moved to compel debtors to make payments and assume or reject an executory contract.
Ruling: 
Debtor's proposed chapter 13 plan was not confirmable since the plan did not provide for the debtor assuming an executory contract.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Gonzalez. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Blair

Debtors filed a voluntary chapter 7 petition and elected the Texas exemptions, including the generous homestead exemption. Movant unsecured creditor objected to the claim of exemption, arguing that the debtors were subject to the $125,000 cap on their homestead exemption provided in 11 U.S.C. § 522(p).
Ruling: 
Debtors'payments made during the 1,215 days prior to filing that increased their homestead's equity value did not create an interest in real property and thus were not subject to the statutory cap on electing a state homestead exemption.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Blair. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Kirchner v. Sticht (In re Sticht)

Plaintiffs, several buyers or intended buyers of homes built by debtors, brought consolidated adversary proceeding seeking denial of a discharge of debtors'obligations to them pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727 and a determination that debtors'debts to them were not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523.
Ruling: 
Debtor builders were denied discharge since the numerous errors and omissions in their schedules amounted to a reckless disregard for the truth.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kirchner v. Sticht (In re Sticht). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Pages

Subscribe to Northern District