Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

District of south carolina

In re Mupanduki

Ruling
Court sustained debtor's objection to proof of claim since it was not "domestic support obligation."
Procedural posture

Creditor served as the debtor's domestic relations counsel and filed a claim for legal fees for her representation of the debtor. The creditor argued that her claim was a "domestic support obligation"entitled to priority treatment. The debtor filed an objection to the proof of claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mupanduki Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 26, 2006 , LexisNexis #0806-001

In re Jupiter

Ruling
Court issued order confirming termination of automatic stay and held that section 362(c)(3)(A) terminated automatic stay as to debtor and property of debtor's estate.
Procedural posture

This matter came before the court upon a request for an order confirming termination of the automatic stay filed by creditor. Creditor sought an order confirming termination of the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(j) and U.S. Dist. Ct., D.S.C., Bankr. R. 4001-l(d).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jupiter Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 21, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-108

In re Tubular Techs. LLC

Ruling
Court denied debtor's motion to extend time to assume or reject lease since deadline to assume had lapsed.
Procedural posture

The debtor filed a motion to extend the time to assume or reject a lease under 11 U.S.C. § 365. The owner of the premises challenged the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Tubular Techs. LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 21, 2006 , LexisNexis #0806-007

In re Westerlund

Ruling
Application for allowance of administrative claim was denied since debtors failed to show alleged "extraordinary moving expenses"were actual and necessary costs of preserving estate.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed an application for allowance of a claim as an administrative expense pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 503(b) and 507(a)(1). The debtors asserted that they were entitled to an administrative expense claim for the payment of expenses associated with the sale of their home during the course of the case. The chapter 7 trustee filed an objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Westerlund Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 21, 2006 , LexisNexis #0806-022

MBNA Am. Bank N.A. v. Gainey (In re Gainey)

Ruling
Creditor did not prove that dismissal was warranted.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an amended complaint seeking to determine the dischargeability of a consumer debt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2). The creditor made a motion in its closing requesting that it be allowed to amend the amended complaint to assert causes of action pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(3), (4) and (6). The debtor asserted a counter claim under 11 U.S.C. § 523(d).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of MBNA Am. Bank N.A. v. Gainey (In re Gainey) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 07, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-098

In re Simmons

Ruling
Plan payments to trustee rather than direct payments, did not deprive creditor of adequate protection.
Procedural posture

Movant creditor filed for relief from the automatic stay. Respondents, debtors and the chapter 13 trustee, opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Simmons Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 31, 2006 , LexisNexis #0906-047

Glover v. Saunders Inc. (In re Glover)

Ruling
Employer's partial withholding of debtor's real estate commissionwas a willfull violation of stay.
Procedural posture

Chapter 11 debtor filed a motion for partial summary judgment, which sought to obtain judgment against defendants, a realty company and its individual owner, for a willful violation of the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Glover v. Saunders Inc. (In re Glover) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 31, 2006 , LexisNexis #0906-050

Duncan v. Duncan (In re Duncan)

Ruling
Dischargeability of wrongful death damages award was not collaterally estopped since the judgment was based on a different legal standard than section 523(a)(6)'s willful and malicious injury standard.
Procedural posture

Appellant estate administrator sought review of an order of the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which granted summary judgment to appellee debtor in an adversary proceeding brought by the bankruptcy estate to challenge the dischargeability of a judgment debt owed by the debtor arising out of a state wrongful death action.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Duncan v. Duncan (In re Duncan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on May 24, 2006 , LexisNexis #0606-056

In re Elbert

Ruling
Debtor who was earning income subsequent to two prior dismissals and could now make plan payments was entitled to extension of stay.
Procedural posture

Movant debtor sought to extend the stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B). Respondent chapter 13 trustee filed a response.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Elbert Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 16, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-006

In re Harvin

Ruling
Motion to dismiss was granted due to omissions by debtor in schedules.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13. Interested party, the trustee, filed a motion to dismiss the case with prejudice for three years pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c) for debtor's bad faith failure to disclose assets and the delay in amending his schedules to disclose assets after their discovery.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Harvin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 11, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-103