Skip to main content

§ 157(a)

Moyer Grp., Inc., In re--Pereira v. Frenkel Benefits, LLC

Ruling
Defendant's motion to dismiss the eleventh claim for relief granted as the amended complaintfailed to assert with sufficient specificity that defendant was unjustly enriched. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Procedures; Reference of Cases and Proceedings by District Court to Bankruptcy Court.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moyer Grp., Inc., In re--Pereira v. Frenkel Benefits, LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 26, 2018 , LexisNexis #0818-026

Solution Trust v. 2100 Grand LLC (In re AWTR Liquidation Inc.)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court could issue final judgments or orders on claims objections and the avoidance claims, as well as rulings on motions to dismiss and for a more definite statement.
Issue(s)
Did the bankruptcy court have subject matter jurisdiction and authority to issue final judgments or orders on claims objections d the avoidance claims or issue final rulings on motions to dismiss and for a more definite statement?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Solution Trust v. 2100 Grand LLC (In re AWTR Liquidation Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 11, 2016 , LexisNexis #0416-065

Desormes v. Charlotte School of Law LLC

Ruling
Motion to withdraw reference of core proceeding to determine dischargeability of student loan debt denied.
Procedural posture

Debtor initiated an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(8), to determine the dischargeability of student loans. Debtor then filed a stay violation action, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362, against defendants. Debtor filed a second dischargeability action, then moved to withdraw the reference of the first dischargeability action and the stay violation action.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Desormes v. Charlotte School of Law LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 03, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-134

In re Means

Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction over debtor's prepetition federal action to rescind mortgage
Procedural posture

A bankruptcy debtor brought an action to rescind a mortgage obligation, the action was removed to federal district court, and the debtor then filed a bankruptcy petition. The bankruptcy court considered its jurisdiction over the action in view of a district court order which appeared to conclude that the case was already before the bankruptcy court.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Means Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 04, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-028

Gulfmark Offshore Inc. v. Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Co.

Ruling
Action for breach of shipbuilding contract referred to bankruptcy court where debtor builder's involuntary case was pending.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff offshore company sued defendants, a shipbuilding company and its officers and directors, alleging breach of a contract to build vessels and related claims, including unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty. The claims were stayed after commencement of a bankruptcy action for the shipbuilder. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(a), the offshore company moved to refer the suit to the bankruptcy court. Defendants contested the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gulfmark Offshore Inc. v. Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #1209-025

Doucet v. Drycock Coal Com. (In re Oakley)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court had jurisdiction over proceeding concerning stock that was property of the estate.
Procedural posture

Appellees, a bankruptcy trustee and a creditor, brought an adversary proceeding against pro se appellant bankruptcy debtor and others seeking a determination that certain stock was property of the debtor's estate in which the creditor claimed a security interest. The debtor appealed the order of the bankruptcy court for the Southern District of Ohio which denied the debtor's posttrial motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and standing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Doucet v. Drycock Coal Com. (In re Oakley) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 18, 2009 , LexisNexis #0709-105

Scully v. Danzig (In re Valley Food Servs. LLC)

Ruling
Claim that would not have effect on bankruptcy case was not within bankruptcy court jurisdiction or supplemental jurisdiction.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bankruptcy trustee brought an adversary proceeding against defendant and third-party plaintiff guarantor of obligations owed to third-party defendant bank by a bankruptcy debtor, and the guarantor asserted that the bank improperly manipulated perfection of security interests which subjected the guarantor to preference liability. The bank moved to dismiss the third-party complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Scully v. Danzig (In re Valley Food Servs. LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 09, 2008 , LexisNexis #0309-134

Kasim v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly dismissed debtor's action under Fair Credit Reporting Act as non- core and lacking sufficient close nexus with bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

After appellant debtor received a chapter 11 discharge, he filed an action in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon alleging that appellee consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FRCA), 15 U.S.C.S. § 1681 et seq. The bankruptcy court dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction, and the debtor sought review of that decision.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kasim v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-140

Baumgartner v. Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC

Ruling
Dispute over creditor's repossession of vehicle after lifting of stay was not related to bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff, a discharged chapter 7 debtor, filed a conversion suit in the Circuit Court of Callaway County (Missouri) against defendant creditor alleging that it unlawfully repossessed his truck. The debtor filed a motion to remand after the creditor removed the suit to the court. The creditor moved to reassign or transfer the case to the bankruptcy court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Baumgartner v. Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-058

In re Buran

Ruling
Removed action for dissolution of corporation of which debtor owned 50% of stock referred to bankruptcy court.
Procedural posture

Prior to filing for bankruptcy, petitioner chapter 11 debtor filed a proceeding in a New York state court for dissolution of a corporation. The debtor removed the dissolution action to district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1452 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9027 and moved for referral to bankruptcy court. Respondent shareholder purported to move for remand to state court.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Buran Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on September 12, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-034