Skip to main content

§ 1412

In re Rogan

Ruling
Transfer of venue to district where case related to debtor's rights in property was pending denied.
Procedural posture

Creditors moved to transfer venue of a bankruptcy debtor's chapter 11 bankruptcy case to an adjacent district where a district court collection proceeding was pending with regard to misconduct of the debtor's spouse which was related to the bankruptcy debtor's rights in property.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rogan Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 11, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-029

Dwight v. TitleMax of Tenn. Inc.

Ruling
State class action removed and transferred to district court where defendant's bankruptcy was pending.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, borrowers, initiated a state action against defendant corporation and sought damages under Tenn. Code Ann. § 45-15-111, § 45-2-210, and § 47-18-101 et seq. The borrowers were granted class action certification. The corporation filed a notice of filing of bankruptcy in the state action and a notice of removal under 28 U.S.C.S. §§ 1334, 1446, 1452, and 157(e). The corporation sought to transfer the matter. The borrowers moved to remand.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dwight v. TitleMax of Tenn. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 21, 2010 , LexisNexis #0210-132

In re Pilgrims Pride Corp.

Ruling
Debtor's motion for estimation of Fair Labor Standards Act claim transferred to district court where the underlying action was pending.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff claimants filed a motion seeking transfer of claims they filed against chapter 11 debtors' bankruptcy estates to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division. The debtors joined the claimants' motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pilgrims Pride Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 10, 2009 , LexisNexis #1009-058

Creekridge Capital LLC v. Louisiana Hosp. Ctr. LLC

Ruling
Action for default under medical equipment lease transferred to district court where related bankruptcy of one defendant was pending.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff, a Minnesota company that leased medical equipment, sued defendants, two Louisiana, and one Kansas, hospital corporations and individual doctor/guarantors, in state court claiming that defendants were in default on an agreement to lease medical equipment and that defendants had not cured the default. Defendants removed the action and moved to transfer it to the District of Louisiana.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Creekridge Capital LLC v. Louisiana Hosp. Ctr. LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 20, 2009 , LexisNexis #0909-135

In re Lawrence & Assocs. LLC

Ruling
Bankruptcy case transferred to district court where debtor's LLC managed hundreds of properties and employees.
Procedural posture

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1412 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1014(b), movants, prospective unsecured creditors, filed a motion requesting that the court transfer debtors' individual bankruptcy case, filed Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York, to the District of Idaho where the debtors' limited liability company (LLC) had previously filed a petition for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lawrence & Assocs. LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 02, 2009 , LexisNexis #0809-095

Longhorn Partners. Pipeline LP v. KM Liquids Terminals LLC

Ruling
Transfer of venue of dispute over pipeline to state where owner had filed bankruptcy denied where current venue was most convenient.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff pipeline owner brought suit against defendant terminal operator in state court. The pipeline owner sought damages and a declaratory judgment clarifying the parties' rights and obligations under their contract. The terminal operator removed the case to the instant court. The pipeline owner then filed a motion to transfer venue to the District Court for the District of Delaware, the district where its bankruptcy was pending.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Longhorn Partners. Pipeline LP v. KM Liquids Terminals LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 30, 2009 , LexisNexis #0909-100

Manchester Inc. v. Lyle (In re Manchester Inc.)

Ruling
Avoidance proceeding transferred pursuant to forum selection clause in contract with transferee.
Procedural posture

Debtor and litigation trustee filed an adversary proceeding against car business sellers, alleging, inter alia, breach of contract and seeking avoidance and recovery of transfers pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 544(a), 547, and 548. Relying on 28 U.S.C.S. §§ 1404 or 1406, the sellers moved to dismiss or transfer the adversary proceeding to another judicial district pursuant to a forum selection clause in the parties' contracts.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Manchester Inc. v. Lyle (In re Manchester Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 01, 2009 , LexisNexis #0709-064

MD Acquisition LLC v. Myers

Ruling
Action for rescission of stock purchase agreement transferred to bankruptcy court as related to pending case.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, a debtor and its purchaser, filed a motion to transfer to the bankruptcy court their complaint for recission of a stock purchase agreement or, in the alternative, damages for state law claims. Defendant employee filed a motion for permissive and mandatory abstention under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(c)(1) and (2) and equitable remand to the state court.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of MD Acquisition LLC v. Myers Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 23, 2009 , LexisNexis #0409-020

In re Jessop

Ruling
Transfer, rather than dismissal, ordered where debtor had lived in another state for ten months prior to filing.
Procedural posture

A U.S. Trustee sought to dismiss or transfer venue because the debtors filed their case in Utah when they had admittedly been living in Arizona for the ten months prior to filing. The debtors sought to have venue transferred rather than the case dismissed for improper venue. In its proposed findings and conclusions, a bankruptcy court recommended the transfer.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jessop Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 13, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-135

Schultz Douglass Farms LLC v. XC Networks Ltd.

Ruling
Case transferred to district where bankruptcies of two defendants were pending.
Procedural posture

After a case was removed from state court to federal district court, defendant Texas corporation moved to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The Texas corporation claimed that the bankruptcy court of that district had jurisdiction because it presided over the bankruptcy proceedings filed by two other defendants in the case. Plaintiff limited liability corporation did not respond.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schultz Douglass Farms LLC v. XC Networks Ltd. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 08, 2009 , LexisNexis #0209-070