Giles, In re--Mote v. Giles

Debtor's loan debt was not excepted from discharge as creditors failed to prove false pretensesthat gave rise to the debt since the only false representation alleged was that of the debtor'sdeceased husband. (Bankr. D. Kan.)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Giles, In re--Mote v. Giles. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 13,2020, LexisNexis #1220-038