Skip to main content

In re May

In re May

Ruling
Debtors could not deduct mortgage payments on stripped lien in projected disposable income calculation.
Procedural posture

A trustee objected to confirmation of the chapter 13 debtors' plan pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B) on the basis that it did not dedicate all of the debtors' disposable income to unsecured creditors. The trustee contended that the debtors could not deduct the mortgage payments on a stripped lien to arrive at their projected disposable income.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re May Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 12, 2010 , LexisNexis #1210-100