Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge parrish creswell

Moseley, In re

Ruling
Request was not a proper use of Rule 2004 discovery as it represented an effort to circumvent the discovery rules of the state court litigation. (Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Examination.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moseley, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 22, 2025 , LexisNexis #0925-099

Silmon, In re

Ruling
Debtor's unsecured creditors were entitled to the pro rata distribution from the amount returned to trustee as it was undisputed that the unsecured creditors were not paid in full. (Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Payments.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Silmon, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 01, 2024 , LexisNexis #1224-048

Holmes, In re

Ruling
Trustee and a bank creditor were entitled to dismissal of debtor's Chapter 13 case as the debtorwas ineligible for bankruptcy relief as his case was filed within 180 days of his voluntarydismissal of a prior case. (Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Who May Be a Debtor; Exception for Debtors with Certain Prior Dismissals; Voluntary

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Holmes, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 11, 2023 , LexisNexis #1123-026

Drew v. ALG Senior, LLC

Ruling
Proceeding comprised of purely Alabama state law claims was subject to equitable remand.(Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Procedures; Title 11 Cases and Core Proceedings; Personal Injury Tort and

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Drew v. ALG Senior, LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 29, 2022 , LexisNexis #1022-065

Bulger, In re

Ruling
Debtor's case dismissed with a two-year filing injunction due to abuse of the bankruptcyprocess as a tactic to stall his largest creditors and leverage a settlement of the state court case.(Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Who May Be a Debtor; Mandatory Credit Counseling.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bulger, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 17, 2021 , LexisNexis #0222-026

Mayo, In re

Ruling
Pawnshop creditor was entitled to repossess vehicle after debtor filed its third chapter 13proceeding as dismissal of the first chapter 13 case resulted in a restoration of title with thecreditor. (Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Dismissal.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mayo, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 30, 2021 , LexisNexis #1121-078

Jones, In re--Wheeler Bros. v. Jones

Ruling
District court judgment debt was nondischargeable due to operation of collateral estoppel.(Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jones, In re--Wheeler Bros. v. Jones Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 24, 2020 , LexisNexis #0320-009

Todd, In re

Ruling
Motion to dismiss was due to be granted where trustee failed to show that there was a waiverof the statute of limitations defense. (Bankr. M.D. Ala.)
Issue(s)
Trustee as Lien Creditor and as Successor to Certain Creditors and Purchasers.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Todd, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 15, 2019 , LexisNexis #0919-038