Erickson, In re--Prado v. Erickson

Ruling: 
Debt could not be excepted from discharge as there was no connection between the fraudulenttransfer scheme and the debt. (Bankr. W.D. Tex.)
Issue: 
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False Representations or Actual Fraud.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Erickson, In re--Prado v. Erickson. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 29,2017, LexisNexis #1117-048