Skip to main content

Davis v. Hoserman (In re Hosterman)

Davis v. Hoserman (In re Hosterman)

Ruling
Hold harmless obligation contained in divorce decree was nondischargeable due to BAPCA elimination of "balancing test."
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor, the former wife of defendant debtor, brought an adversary proceeding to determine whether a hold harmless provision in the parties'decree of divorce, whereby the debtor agreed to hold the former wife harmless as to various credit card debts, constituted a nondischargable obligation of the debtor within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Davis v. Hoserman (In re Hosterman) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-077