§ 547

Pierce v. Collections Assocs. (In re Pierce)

Ruling: 
Debtor could not recover preference period garnishment that was less than $600.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pierce v. Collections Assocs. (In re Pierce). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 30,2013, LexisNexis #0114-091

In re Ridings

Ruling: 
Debtor could not modify confirmed chapter 13 plan to reclassify secured claim as unsecured and pay less than the full amount of the claim.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ridings. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 22,2013, LexisNexis #0116-103

Rentas v. Vaquerias Tres Monjitas Inc. (PMC Mktg. Corp.)

Ruling: 
Preference period payments were avoidable as not made for new value or in ordinary course of business.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rentas v. Vaquerias Tres Monjitas Inc. (PMC Mktg. Corp.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on December 20,2013, LexisNexis #0114-090

Weinman v. New Penn Motor Express Inc. (In re Office Source Inc.)

Ruling: 
Summary report intended to establish ordinary course of business defense was admissible but only established defense for one of two creditors.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Weinman v. New Penn Motor Express Inc. (In re Office Source Inc.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on December 11,2013, LexisNexis #0114-022

Williams v. Mckesson Corp. (In re Quality Infusion Care Inc.)

Ruling: 
Transfers to medical supplier pursuant to settlement were not made in the ordinary course of business and were avoidable.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Williams v. Mckesson Corp. (In re Quality Infusion Care Inc.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on November 25,2013, LexisNexis #0214-060

UTE Mesa Lot 1 LLC v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. (In re UTE Mesa Lot 1 LLC)

Ruling: 
Lis pendens was not a preferential transfer.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of UTE Mesa Lot 1 LLC v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. (In re UTE Mesa Lot 1 LLC). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on November 25,2013, LexisNexis #1213-089

Rushton v. SMC Elec. Prods. (In re C.W. Mining Co.)

Ruling: 
Preference period payments to new vendor for electrical system were within industry standard and made in ordinary course of business.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rushton v. SMC Elec. Prods. (In re C.W. Mining Co.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on November 05,2013, LexisNexis #1113-127

Meiburger v. Hilburn (In re Ponsen)

Ruling: 
Transfers to creditor, debtor's sister, of trust properties held on her behalf, but in which she had not retained in rem interest, were preferential.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Meiburger v. Hilburn (In re Ponsen). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 22,2013, LexisNexis #1113-056

Sarachek v. Cohen (In re Agriprocessors Inc.)

Ruling: 
Transfers to non-statutory insiders avoided as preferential.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sarachek v. Cohen (In re Agriprocessors Inc.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on October 21,2013, LexisNexis #1113-057

Burtch v. Masiz (In re Vaso Active Pharms. Inc.)

Ruling: 
Receipt of proceeds of debtor's malpractice action settlement by debtor's principal amounted to fraudulent transfer.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Burtch v. Masiz (In re Vaso Active Pharms. Inc.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on October 15,2013, LexisNexis #1113-019

Pages

Subscribe to § 547