Skip to main content

§ 522(b)

Garcia Matos v. Oliveras Rivera (In re Garcia Matos)

Ruling
Order sustaining trustee's objection to exemption in prepetition tax refund reversed.
Procedural posture

Debtor claimed an exemption in an income tax refund which the debtor would receive after the end of the tax year, but bankruptcy trustee contended that the refund was projected disposable income which could not be exempted. The debtor appealed the order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico which sustained the trustee's objection to the exemption.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Garcia Matos v. Oliveras Rivera (In re Garcia Matos) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 26, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-047

In re Shell

Ruling
Debtor who resided in an "opt out" state for majority of 180 day period before 730 day prepetition period could not elect federal exemptions.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 trustee objected to the exemptions claimed by debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Shell Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 14, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-077

In re Helm

Ruling
Objection to 50 percent exemption claimed by debtor in properties owned by entireties with non-debtor spouse sustained.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 debtor and creditors filed objections to exemptions claimed by the debtor under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(b)(3)(B). The trustee filed a motion for turnover of property held by the debtor and non-debtor spouse.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Helm Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 09, 2012 , LexisNexis #0512-123

In re Footen

Ruling
Debtors who were ineligible for exemptions in current or former home state could claim federal exemptions.
Procedural posture

This matter came before the court on the trustee's objection to debtors' claimed exemptions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Footen Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 29, 2012 , LexisNexis #0412-010

Mullen v. Hamlin (Hamlin)

Ruling
Exemption in IRA inherited prepetition from non-spouse properly disallowed.
Procedural posture

Appellant chapter 7 trustee sought review of an order from the bankruptcy court for the district of Arizona, which allowed debtors' claimed exemption under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(b)(3)(C) for an individual retirement account (IRA) inherited from her grandmother pre-petition, via a trustee-to-trustee transfer.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mullen v. Hamlin (Hamlin) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 21, 2012 , LexisNexis #0412-112

In re Daley

Ruling
Funds in IRA involved in prohibited transaction were not exempt.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a trustee was appointed to administer the debtor's bankruptcy estate. The trustee filed an objection to the debtor's claim that $61,646 he had in an individual retirement account ("IRA") was exempt from creditors' claims under Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-105(b) and 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(b)(3)(C).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Daley Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 11, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-009

In re Garvey

Ruling
Funding source did not affect debtor's IRA exemption.
Procedural posture

A bankruptcy debtor claimed exemptions in tax-exempt individual retirement accounts (IRAs) pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(b)(3)(C), the bankruptcy trustee objected to the exemptions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Garvey Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 28, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-078

Danduran v. Kaler (In re Danduran)

Ruling
Bankruptcy appellate panel erred in reversing bankruptcy court holding that proceeds of personal property sold with homestead were not proceeds of the homestead.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 Trustee, appealed from a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) of the Eighth Circuit reversing a bankruptcy court's judgment that the proceeds of personal property sold with a homestead are not proceeds of the homestead.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Danduran v. Kaler (In re Danduran) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 16, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-044

In re Taber

Ruling
Debtor entitled to exemption in IRAs inherited during chapter 13 case prior to conversion to chapter 7.
Procedural posture

A bankruptcy debtor claimed exemptions pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(b)(3) in individual retirement accounts which the debtor inherited during her Chapter 13 case prior to conversion of the case to Chapter 7. The bankruptcy trustee objected to the exemptions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Taber Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 12, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-045

In re Chreky

Ruling
Exemption in interest in LLC held by the entireties and created before creditors' claims arose allowed.
Procedural posture

Two judgment creditors, former employees of chapter 11 debtor's business, presented objections to the exemptions claimed by the debtor of his interests in a money market account, CDs, and CDARS accounts, and an interest in a limited liability company (LLC), as exempt under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(b)(3)(B), on the basis that the accounts and LLC were held as tenancies by the entireties.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Chreky Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 25, 2011 , LexisNexis #0811-115