Skip to main content

§ 350

In re Corbett

Ruling
Debtor seeking to reopen no-asset case to list additional creditors required to file verified motion establishing cause.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a motion to reopen her no-asset chapter 7 case pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 350(b) so that she could list additional creditors that she inadvertently failed to list on her original schedule F.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Corbett Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 08, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-002

In re Meneses

Ruling
Debtor could not reopen case to list previously undisclosed workplace injury action against employer that was dismissed.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a voluntary petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. An order was entered granting the debtor his discharge, and the case was closed. The debtor moved to reopen the case under 11 U.S.C.S. § 350(b). An employer objected.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Meneses Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 03, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-135

In re Cotnoir

Ruling
Court lacked power to vacate discharge after more than one year to allow debtor to enter into reaffirmation agreement.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed a motion to reopen their closed chapter 7 case, in order to enter into a reaffirmation agreement with a creditor mortgage lender nunc pro tunc to a date prior to the entry of the discharge.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cotnoir Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 23, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-038

Shotkoski v. Fokkena (In re Shotkoski)

Ruling
Debtors' motion for entry of final decree denied where discharge had not yet entered and estate was not fully administered.
Procedural posture

Chapter 11 debtors sought review of an order of the bankruptcy court for the District of South Dakota, which denied their motion for entry of a final decree pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 350(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3022.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Shotkoski v. Fokkena (In re Shotkoski) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 24, 2009 , LexisNexis #1209-074

Mohorne v. Beal Bank

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly refused to reopen long closed case for determination of issues that could be raised in debtor's current case.
Procedural posture

Appellant property owner filed a quiet title action against appellee bank. Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the district court granted summary judgment to the bank. The property owner filed a bankruptcy petition. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of rehearing based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and collateral estoppel. The bankruptcy court denied the property owner's remaining motions. The property owner appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mohorne v. Beal Bank Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #1209-075

In re Johnson

Ruling
Case where plan was substantially consummated could be closed to avoid quarterly fees.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a motion to close his chapter 11 bankruptcy case, subject to being reopened after the plan payments had been completed so that a discharge could be entered. The United States Trustee (UST) that the case should have remained open until the plan payments were completed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Johnson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 04, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-075

Bishop v. Thomas Gamble (In re Bishop)

Ruling
Non-parties in interest lacked standing to reopen debtor's dismissed bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

After his chapter 11 bankruptcy case was dismissed, debtor filed an action in the Circuit Court of Marshall County, Alabama, alleging that defendants, a construction company, an LLC, and two individuals converted property that belonged to a company the debtor owned. Defendants removed the case to the bankruptcy court and filed a motion to reopen the debtor's bankruptcy case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bishop v. Thomas Gamble (In re Bishop) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 06, 2009 , LexisNexis #0409-136

In re Lowery

Ruling
Bankruptcy court declined to reopen case to administer debtor's previously concealed personal injury claim.
Procedural posture

Eight years after a bankruptcy debtor was granted a discharge and her case was closed, the debtor moved to reopen the case pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 350(b) in order to schedule a previously undisclosed personal injury claim for administration in the case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lowery Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 31, 2008 , LexisNexis #0209-026

In re Reid

Ruling
Bankruptcy case reopened to determine validity of release of tort claim.
Procedural posture

Following a chapter 7 discharge, an administrator of a decedent's estate sued the debtor in state court, seeking monetary damages for claims arising out of a pre-petition collision on the grounds that a release signed pursuant to a settlement agreement was unenforceable. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 350(b), the debtor moved to reopen her bankruptcy case seeking to enforce the discharge injunction against the tort claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Reid Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 03, 2008 , LexisNexis #0109-031

In re Stein

Ruling
Case reopened to determine debtor's rights in property which debtor recently learned was co- owned with deceased former spouse.
Procedural posture

After a bankruptcy debtor's case had been closed for eight years, the debtor moved to reopen the case pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 350(b) to allow amendment of his schedules to list an interest in real property which the debtor co-owned with his deceased former spouse. The administrator of the spouse's estate opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Stein Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 17, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-030