Skip to main content

§ 1327(a)

In re Brunson

Ruling
Postconfirmation motion for relief from stay denied due to application of res judicata.
Procedural posture

Following plan confirmation, a creditor filed a motion for relief from the automatic stay in a debtor's chapter 13 bankruptcy case based on the debtor's failure to make any post- petition payments to the creditor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Brunson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 06, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-130

In re Carter

Ruling
Creditor's objection to trustee's notice of disallowance of claim overruled due to failure to timely object to confirmed plan.
Procedural posture

A creditor objected to a trustee's notice allowing/disallowing claims, which showed that the creditor was to receive nothing under the debtor's chapter 13 plan on the creditor's secured or unsecured claims and that the debtor's real property was to be surrendered in lieu of the entire debt to the creditor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Carter Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 15, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-052

Case v. Wells Fargo Bank

Ruling
Challenge to interest on interest payments in confirmed plans dismissed due to application of res judicata.
Procedural posture

The dispute involved interest on interest payments made under confirmed plans. Plaintiff debtors asserted the payments violated 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(e). Count I of each complaint sought disgorgement under 11 U.S.C.S. § 502(j). Count II alleged abuse of process under 11 U.S.C.S. § 105. Debtors also sought class certification. Defendants were secured creditors. The matter was remanded by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Case v. Wells Fargo Bank Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 19, 2008 , LexisNexis #0508-070

In re Porter

Ruling
Debtor could not preserve otherwise undisclosed prepetition causes of action that would not be pursued until after confirmation.
Procedural posture

In two chapter 13 cases, the debtors' plans contained a provision that purported to preserve a broad range of not-yet-ripe causes of action against unidentified parties. In both cases, the language of the provision was identical and a creditor objected. The court confirmed both plans, with the caveat that adjudication of the objections could result in the controversial provision being modified or stricken.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Porter Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 08, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308021

In re Myers

Ruling
Debtors bound by mortgage arrearage included in confirmed plan where reservation of rights to object to claims was overbroad.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 debtor filed an objection to the proof of claim filed by a creditor. The creditor filed a motion to strike the debtor's request for production of documents and for an accounting.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Myers Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 06, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308-095

In re Munck

Ruling
State could not reopen case for determination of dischargeability of child support which was barred by plan confirmation.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13 and the case was closed in January, 2006. A creditor, the State of West Virginia, on behalf of a mother, sought to reopen the case to determine dischargeability of a child support obligation owed to the mother. Debtors sought an order to show cause why the State should not be held in contempt for taking action to collect the debt at issue.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Munck Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-069

In re Keck

Ruling
Overruling of objection to confirmation stood after reversal due to creditor's failure to obtain stay pending appeal.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee objected to a creditor's proof of claim under a retail installment contract and security agreement with the debtors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Keck Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 23, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-124

In re Hibble

Ruling
Creditor not entitled to deficiency claim resulting from post-confirmation disposition of collateral although a portion was allowable as administrative expense.
Procedural posture

The creditor, that held an undersecured lien on debtor's motor vehicle, repossessed the vehicle and sold it after the debtor defaulted and failed to make agreed monthly payments "outside" the bankruptcy estate. The creditor then filed a claim for the deficiency on the sale. The debtor objected to the claim as untimely, because it was filed after both the claims bar date and the entry of the order of confirmation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hibble Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 18, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-034

In re Whitney

Ruling
Discharge denied where debtor had not complied with requirement to contribute all disposable income to plan for 60-month period.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a Motion for Discharge Following Full Payment of Plan. Also interested in the motion was the chapter 13 trustee, who opposed the motion. At issue was whether debtor in fact had complied with the terms of the confirmed chapter 13 plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Whitney Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 07, 2007 , LexisNexis #0707-104

In re Smith

Ruling
Creditor that failed to object to bifurcation of claim prior to confirmation was bound by plan.
Procedural posture

After plan confirmation, the chapter 13 debtor objected to a secured creditor's proof of claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Smith Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 29, 2007 , LexisNexis #0707-017