§ 1322(b)

Edwards, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was deemed current on all mortgage obligations owed to the creditor where debtorsatisfied all conditions of the confirmed modified plan and already received a discharge.(Bankr. S.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Edwards, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 22,2019, LexisNexis #0819-017

Battershell, In re

Ruling: 
Court had no ability to recharacterize loan payoff as a loan purchase. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Battershell, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 14,2019, LexisNexis #0719-097

United States v. Yurek

Ruling: 
Evidence was sufficient to convict debtor of bankruptcy fraud as all of the elements of fraudwere present in the trial evidence. (10th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States v. Yurek. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 21,2019, LexisNexis #0719-098

Unacha, In re

Ruling: 
Chapter 13 plan could be confirmed over a creditor's objection solely on the grounds that aban modification could not constitute cure. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Unacha, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 23,2019, LexisNexis #0619-098

Chu, In re

Ruling: 
Separate classification of debtor's gambling debt deemed as an unfair discrimination againstcasino creditor. (Bankr. E.D. Va.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chu, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 10,2019, LexisNexis #0619-074

Guice, In re

Ruling: 
Anti-modification protections did not apply to debtor's proposed cramdown as creditor wassecured by both a security interest and a judgment lien against the debtor's condo. (Bankr.D.N.J.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Guice, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 28,2019, LexisNexis #0419-043

Heiser, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor was allowed to treat creditor's installment land contract as a residential mortgage thatcan be cured during the plan's five-year term. (Bankr. M.D. Pa.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Heiser, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 24,2019, LexisNexis #0419-021

Hansen, In re

Ruling: 
Confirmation of debtors' chapter 13 plan was granted as debtor did not impermissibly modify his secured claim because the lien was not a security interest but rather a nonconsensual statutory mechanic's lien. (Bankr. N.D. Iowa)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hansen, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 25,2018, LexisNexis #1118-056

Recinos

Ruling: 
Plan was subject to anti-modification prohibition as it specifically asserted that the propertyat issue was the debtor's principal residence rather than an investment property. (Bankr. D.Nev.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Recinos. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 28,2018, LexisNexis #1118-023

Monahan, In re--Monahan v. Fore River, L.L.C.

Ruling: 
Defendant's mortgage was wholly unsecured and was stripped off as the first mortgage exceeded the property's value. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Monahan, In re--Monahan v. Fore River, L.L.C.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 20,2018, LexisNexis #0818-116

Pages

Subscribe to § 1322(b)