§ 109

In re Carr

A debtor was ordered to show cause why his chapter 13 bankruptcy case should not have been dismissed for failure to obtain prepetition, non-profit, budget and credit counseling as required by 11 U.S.C. § 109(h).
Ruling: 
Case was dismissed since debtor failed to request prefiling credit counseling.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Carr. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Star

The trustee objected to a debtor's motion to proceed without meeting the credit counseling requirement of 11 U.S.C. § 109(h). The debtor filed an unopposed motion to conduct his 11 U.S.C. § 341 meeting of creditors telephonically.
Ruling: 
Debtor did not qualify for permanent waiver of credit counseling requirement but was granted extension of time to receive counseling due to incarceration.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Star. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Hedquist v. Fokkena (In re Hedquist)

Appellant, a pro se debtor, challenged a decision of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota that held debtor and his wife were ineligible to file their chapter 11 bankruptcy case for failing to comply with the credit counseling requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 109(h), and dismissed their case.
Ruling: 
Court rejected equal protection argument of pro se debtor in dismissing debtor's case for failing to comply with section 109(h) credit counseling requirement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hedquist v. Fokkena (In re Hedquist). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Mills

A bankruptcy petitioner obtained credit counseling as required by 11 U.S.C. § 109(h) on the same day that her bankruptcy petition was filed. The trustee moved to dismiss the petition based on the petitioner's ineligibility to be a debtor under section 109(h).
Ruling: 
Case was dismissed since debtor obtained credit counseling on same day as filing.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mills. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Hawkins

The court previously entered an order to show cause why debtor's case ought not be dismissed for failure to obtain credit counseling prior to the petition date, as required to satisfy the requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 109(h).
Ruling: 
Court deemed that debtor need only make colorable claim of receiving credit counseling to assert jurisdiction and impose automatic stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hawkins. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Raymond

Before the court in a chapter 7 matter was pro se debtor's certification of exigent circumstances.
Ruling: 
Pro se debtor's case was dismissed since debtor's certification of exigent circumstances did not certify that debtor requested credit counseling services but was unable to receive them.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Raymond. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Causey

Movant bankruptcy trustee moved to dismiss nonmovant debtor's bankruptcy petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy relief. The debtor requested recusal of the bankruptcy judge.
Ruling: 
Case was dismissed since debtor did not provide credit counseling certification or provide explanation of exigent circumstances.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Causey. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Seaman

A pro se individual bankruptcy debtor filed his bankruptcy petition, but the debtor neither filed a certificate of credit counseling with his petition pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(h) nor sought a temporary or permanent exemption from the counseling requirement under that section. The trustee moved to dismiss the debtor's petition.
Ruling: 
Court held that dismissal of case rather than striking debtor's petition as void ab initio was the appropriate remedy when debtor failed to meete credit counseling requirement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Seaman. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Salazar

Bankruptcy debtors filed their bankruptcy petition without obtaining credit counseling as required by 11 U.S.C. § 109(h), and the debtors'mortgagee foreclosed on their residence after the petition was filed. The debtors moved for reconsideration of the bankruptcy court's order, which struck the debtor's petition based on ineligibility under section 109(h).
Ruling: 
Foreclosure did not violate an automatic stay since the debtors did not comply with the prefiling credit counseling requirement and were, thus, ineligible as bankruptcy debtors.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Salazar. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

In re Miotto

The matter was before the court on the motion to dismiss the chapter 13 petition brought by the chapter 13 trustee for debtor's failure to comply with 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1). In response, debtor filed a motion to waive the counseling requirement.
Ruling: 
Debtor was denied a motion to waive the prefiling credit counseling requirement since the debtor failed to file a counseling certification and describe the circumstances of any potential exigent circumstances.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Miotto. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Pages

Subscribe to § 109