Spinks, In re

Ruling: 
Court held that the 180-day period of 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(4) was not subject to equitable tollingas it was not a statute of limitation intended to protect against stale claims but to protectworkers in the event of their employer's bankruptcy. (Bankr. S.D. Ga.)
Issue: 
Priorities; Order of Priorities; Wages, Salaries, or Commissions.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Spinks, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 21,2018, LexisNexis #1018-008