Skip to main content

Motta v. Andre (In re Motta)

Motta v. Andre (In re Motta)

Ruling
Mortgage that secured note that was later reamortized could not be avoided by trustee.
Procedural posture

Appellant Chapter 7 trustee filed an adversary proceeding against appellee creditors, seeking a determination that a mortgage the creditors held on real property that was owned by two Chapter 7 debtors was avoidable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 544(a)(3). The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts denied the trustee's motion for summary judgment and entered summary judgment, sua sponte, for the creditors. The trustee appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Motta v. Andre (In re Motta) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 10, 2010 , LexisNexis #1010-119