Cluff v. eCast Settlement
Sep
29
2006
Ruling
Proofs of claim that were not prima facie valid were sufficient absent evidence from debtors to rebut merits.
Procedural posture
Appellant debtors filed separate bankruptcy cases. Appellee unsecured creditors filed proofs of claim in their respective cases. The debtors filed objections to many of the proofs of claim under 11 U.S.C. § 502(b) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001. The bankruptcy court overruled the debtors'objections. The debtors appealed.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cluff v. eCast Settlement Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: