Copeland, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor's motion to reopen his case was denied because it would be pointless to reopen thecase to attempt to avoid the deed of trust which was recorded against the property to secure thecredit authorized by a financing order. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
Issue: 
Closing and Reopening Cases; When to Reopen.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Copeland, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 30,2021, LexisNexis #0921-029